Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wright v. National Surety Corp., 59 So. 2d 695.

98 citing documents.

Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist. 836 So. 2d 14 La. 2003
Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. 721 So. 2d 885 La. 1998
Manuel v. La. Sheriff's Risk Mgmt. Fund 664 So. 2d 81 La. 1995
698 n. 2 (La.1952) (holding that the application of La.Rev.Stat.
John v. Louisiana Sheriff's Risk Management Fund 647 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(1952), the supreme court indicated its approval of the application of penalty statutes against an insurer in cases where the insurance policy was issued before the effective date of the enactment.
Sharbono v. H & S CONST. CO. 478 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Hawkins v. Johns-Manville Corp. 418 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
968 , (1950); , (1952); Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 174 La.
Nelson v. Continental Cas. Co. 412 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Johnson v. Continental Ins. Cos. 410 So. 2d 1058 La. 1982
(1952), holding that the provisions of R.S.
Ferrand v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 398 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Wright v. National Surety *39 Corp., , (1952); Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., 217 La.
Gardner v. Minnie, Inc. 381 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
May v. Market Ins. Co. 373 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
1101 , , Tedesco v. Columbia Ins.
Simmons v. State Dept. of Transp. 368 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
(1952); Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., 217 La.
Fazande v. Continental Grain Co. 363 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(1952) and Morgan v. American Bitumuls Company, 217 La.
LeBlanc v. Commercial Union Assur. Co. 349 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1952); Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., 217 La.
Kilbourne v. Armstrong 351 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1952); Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., 217 La.
Lucas v. Ins. Co. of North America 342 So. 2d 591 La. 1977
Basco v. State of La., Dept. of Corrections 335 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
King v. Insurance Company of North America , above; Ray v. Superior Iron Works and Supply Company, Inc., La.App., ; Thibodeaux v. Associated Distributing Company, La.App., ; Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Company, La.App., ; Roberie v. Ashy Construction Company
Jordan v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY 295 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
As was pointed out in the Wright case [ , 59 So.2d (695) 697], "`The question here, as in all these cases, is whether plaintiff is "disabled to do work of any reasonable character" within the intendment of the compensation statute'."
King v. Insurance Co. of North America 288 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
530 , (1954); , (1952); (La.App.
De Jean v. BF Trappey's Sons, Inc. 285 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 276 So. 2d 271 La. 1973
538 , (1948); , (1952); Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins.
Moore v. Dixie Donut, Inc. 273 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Branum v. J. Ray Mcdermott & Co. 271 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Adams v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 270 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Ory v. Metal Building Products Co. 265 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Aswell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 264 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
We seriously doubt that an employee coming within the terms of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute is an insured within the meaning of the above quoted section of our Insurance Code.” The Supreme Court ( , (1952)) reviewed the case and agreed that only an insured could recover under LSA-R.S.
Jackson v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 252 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
355 , ; , .” And in fixing a reasonable attorney’s fee as authorized under the statute (LSA-R.S.
Breen v. Bituminous Casualty Company 249 So. 2d 338 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
(1952); Mitchell v. Connecticut Indemnity Company, 161 So.
Perrin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 248 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1952); Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance Co., 224 La.
Winters v. City of Shreveport 242 So. 2d 236 La. 1970
Gatte v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 225 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Nichols v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company, 232 La.
Adams v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 214 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Smith v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; Thomas v. Gates, Inc., La.App., ; Johnson v. W. L. Richeson & Sons, La.App., .
Home Insurance Company v. AJ Warehouse, Inc. 210 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Bellard v. Insurance Co. of North America 193 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 185 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Wright v. National Surety Corp., et al., , .
Wells v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 185 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Corp., , (1952), the Supreme Court held that an operator of a large .asphalt spreading truck was a skilled workman and was entitled to compensation for ¡total permanent disability, notwithstanding ■his ability to drive smaller trucks or automobiles and perform duties of employment less strenuous than that of an
Higginbotham v. Newsom Truck Line, Inc. 181 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
161 , ; , ; Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co., 217 La.
McClelland v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 180 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
355 , ; Wright v. National Surety Corporation (1952), , ; Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Co. (La.App.
Soulier v. Raymond 177 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
856 , ; , ; Steadman v. Pearl Assur.
Smith v. Travelers Insurance Company 174 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Wilkins v. Allstate Insurance Company 173 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Nichols v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company, 232 La.
Redding v. Cade 158 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Parish v. Standard Accident Insurance Company 158 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
as requiring the penalties to apply only to compensation payments then overdue for more than sixty days or thereafter to become overdue for more than such period.
Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Company 150 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
As was pointed out in the Wright case [Wright v. National Surety Corp.] [ , 59 So.2d (695) 697], `The question here, as in all these cases, is whether plaintiff is "disabled to do work of any reasonable character" within the intendment of the compensation statute'."
Tullier v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. 148 So. 2d 601 La. 1963
Harris v. A. A. A. Foundation, Inc. 140 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
2d 275 ; Michel v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App., ; , .
Collins v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance 138 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Lindsey v. Continental Casualty Company 138 So. 2d 543 La. 1962
161 , ; , ; Schneider v. Travelers Ins.
Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company 137 So. 2d 894 La. 1962
Plaintiff did possess a calling; certainly a semi-skill if not a skill, that of a truck driver ( , ) and, although he is no longer able to be a truck driver for a cement company, the large area in which the services of truck drivers are essential is otherwise open to him.
Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Co. 137 So. 2d 894 La. 1962
Plaintiff did possess a calling; certainly a semi-skill if not a skill, that of a truck driver ( , ) and, although he is no longer able to be a truck driver for a cement company, the large area in which the services of truck drivers are essential is otherwise open to him.