Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., 75 So. 2d 236.

52 citing documents.

  • Ames Growe, III v. Raymond Johnson and Johnson Realty & Investment Co. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
  • Caskey v. Merrick Construction Co. 86 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Saden, supra; Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , see also Hanks, supra.
  • Crump v. Sabine River Authority 715 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Pierce v. Milford 688 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Pierce v. Milford 688 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Saden v. Kirby 660 So. 2d 423 La. 1995
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Ry., , (1954).
  • Saden v. Kirby 635 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    (1954), the trial court held that an “act of God” or “force majeure” does not necessarily relieve defendants of responsibility, and that defendants’ acts or omissions were a “concurring” or “significant” cause of plaintiffs’ damages.
  • Weeks v. TL James & Co. Inc. 626 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    See, e.g., Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., Gaharan v. State, Through DOTD, J. Weingarten, Inc. v. Northgate Mall, Inc.
  • Trans-Global Alloy v. First Nat. Bank 583 So. 2d 443 La. 1991
    Co., , (1954) (when plaintiff has sustained damage as the result of the defendant's fault, trial court must fix quantum as best it can, and in this connection, trial judge is vested with much discretion).
  • Combs v. Howard 481 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited."
  • Gabler v. Regent Development Corp. 470 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
    2d Cir.1979); Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., Holley v. Louisiana Ry.
  • Faulk v. Cagle Supply, Inc. 412 So. 2d 1020 La. 1982
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited....
  • Thames v. Zerangue 411 So. 2d 17 La. 1982
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited...."
  • Augustine v. Dickenson 406 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    3rd Cir. 1962) (loss of cotton crop from herbicide sprayed aerially); , (1954) (loss of minnows in pond); and Harrison v. Petroleum Surveys, Inc., (La.
  • Rogers v. Nelson Dodge, Inc. 407 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Semon v. City of Shreveport 389 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    Brantly v. Fremont & Gulf Co., , (1954).
  • Emerson v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance 387 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.” There is no mechanical rule that can be universally applied to each damage claim; each case must be individually evaluated according to the evidence presented.
  • Hardie v. Pylant 375 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Burns v. Dominique 354 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Preston v. Chrysler Motor (S) Corporation 334 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , (1954).
  • Maddox v. Louisiana Industries, Inc. 311 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Brantley *281 v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , (1954); (La.App.
  • Smolinski v. Taulli 285 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Co., , (1954) and decisions therein cited."
  • Spillers v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 282 So. 2d 546 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • New Orleans Shrimp Co., Inc. v. DUPLANTIS TRUCK L., INC. 283 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1934(3); Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , (1954); Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 257 La.
  • Roshong v. Travelers Insurance Company 281 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    866 , (1955); Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , (1954).
  • Peoples Moss Gin Co., Inc. v. Jenkins 270 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , and cases cited at 239 (1954).
  • Irby Steel v. W. R. Fairchild Construction Co. 270 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Otillio v. Scopes 265 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company 245 So. 2d 151 La. 1971
    Co., , (1954), and decisions therein cited.
  • Fish v. Martin 201 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Co., , ; White v. Robbins, La.App.
  • Duhon v. Cormier 186 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    Co., , , Farthing v. Neely, La.App.
  • Skansi v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 176 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    See Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , .
  • McGuire v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 175 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    *842 176 , ; Farthing v. Neely, La.App.
  • Campo v. LaNasa 173 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    Germann v. 557 Tire Co., 167 La.
  • Ralph's Fleet, Inc. v. American Marine Corp. 157 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    art. 1934; Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , ; Germann v. 557 Tire Co., Inc., 167 La.
  • Manuel v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 153 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Company, , (loss of minnows); Harrison v. Petroleum Surveys, La.App.
  • White v. Robbins 153 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Co., , ; Bardwell v. Maniscaloo, La.App.
  • Mayeux, Bennett, Hingle Ins. A. v. SOUTHERN BT & T. CO. 148 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    the Supreme Court laid down the following rule: "When it is clear that a plaintiff has sustained some damages as a result of the fault of the defendant, according to our well settled jurisprudence, his demands will not be rejected merely because he cannot establish exactly the amount suffered.
  • Alvis Hotel, Inc. v. Alvis Hotel of Monroe, Inc. 149 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    However, our jurisprudence clearly limits such action to those instances in which a claimant cannot establish with any degree of certainty the amount of damage suffered; Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Company, , ; Farthing v. Neely, La.App.
  • American Employers Insurance Co. v. Schoenfield 144 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Co., , ; Bardwell v. Maniscaloo, La.App.
  • Berryman v. International Paper Co. 139 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Co., , , and Hidalgo v. Dupuy, La.App., .
  • Trahan v. Bearb 138 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , ; Farthing v. Neely, La.App.
  • Wright v. Superior Oil Company 138 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    in which the court held as follows: "When it is clear that a plaintiff has sustained some damages as a result of the fault of the defendant, according to our well settled jurisprudence, his demands will not be rejected merely because he cannot establish exactly the amount suffered.
  • Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. 137 So. 2d 298 La. 1962
    Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , ; Reynolds v. Texas & P. Ry.
  • Bardwell v. Maniscalco 135 So. 2d 84 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    987 , (1951); and Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , (1954).
  • Farthing v. Neely 129 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    However, "In cases where although there is a legal right to recovery, an exact estimation of damages cannot be made, courts have discretion to assess same based upon all the facts and circumstances of the case, see, for instance, Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Company, , ."
  • SCHEINUK FLORIST, INC. v. Southern Bell T. & T. Co. 128 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    [7] Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., 1954, , .
  • Stevens v. Dowden 125 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    Co., , ; Harrison v. Petroleum Surveys, Inc., La.App.
  • Hidalgo v. Dupuy 122 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Pate v. Western Geophysical Co. of America 91 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    On a situation similar to the one existing here, the Supreme Court, in Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co., , , said: "When it is clear that a plaintiff has sustained some damages as a result of the fault of the defendant, according to our well settled jurisprudence, his demands will not be rejected merely because he cannot establish exactly the amount suffered.