DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. Davies, 61 So. 2d 885.

16 citing documents.

  • Guillory v. Hebert 31 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Clivens v. Abraham 582 So. 2d 1341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Broussard v. Breaux 412 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • Lacey v. Baywood Truck & MacHinery 381 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    2541 et seq.; , (1952); Ehrlich v. Roby Motors Co., 166 La.
  • Pickerel v. Long 286 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1952) the court stated: "On the trial of the case on the demand for redhibition the issue was raised as to whether or not the defects complained of were latent or apparent because the plaintiff, defendant in reconvention, contended *433 that they were apparent and as such were not redhibitory vices.
  • Gauche v. Ford Motor Company 226 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    (1952); Ehrlich v. Roby Motors Co., 166 La.
  • Brown v. Dauzat 157 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
  • Pursell v. Kelly 139 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Wilfamco, Inc. v. Interstate Electric Co., 221 La.
  • Harding v. Ed Taussig Edsel Motors, Inc. 130 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Lemonier v. Coco 130 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Bayou Rapides Lumber Co., v. Davies ( , ); George v. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co., 114 La.
  • Russell v. Bartlett 139 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Tuminello v. Mawby, 220 La.
  • Leon v. St. Bernard Parish Democratic Committee 117 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    196 , , this court said: ‘In a number of cases this court has considered evidence of such facts, since it would serve no useful purpose to remand a case for the purpose of offering evidence in the court below of facts which are not denied.’ , .” It is true that, in the Boucher case and in the two cases cited, Wilson v. Wilson and Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. Davies, the occurrences which were sought to be shown by affidavit took place subsequently to the appeal, and in DeFrances v. Gauthier, 220
  • Lemonier v. Coco 112 So. 2d 436 La. 1959
    Code of Practice Article 906.
  • Boucher v. Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 106 So. 2d 285 La. 1958
    196 , , this court said: “In a number of cases this court has considered evidence of such facts, since it would serve no useful purpose to remand a case for the purpose of offering evidence in the court below of facts which are not denied.” , .
  • Wellborn v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. 90 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
  • Kathman-Landry, Inc. v. Morrison 64 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953