Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Haddad, 59 So. 2d 411.

30 citing documents.

State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
(1952), we said: "It is now so firmly established in our jurisprudence that a defendant in a criminal case is not entitled to a pre-trial inspection of written confessions of codefendants, written statements of witnesses, or police reports in the hands of the sheriff, the police department, or the *866
State v. Gray 262 So. 2d 367 La. 1972
State v. Morris 254 So. 2d 444 La. 1971
672 , (1971); , (1952); *448 State v. Wilde, 214 La.
State v. Kreller 233 So. 2d 906 La. 1970
Articles 445 and 446 do nothing more than announce well-recognized rules of evidence in regard to the relevancy of other acts, conduct, and offenses to show intent and knowledge.” , .
State v. Kennedy 230 So. 2d 818 La. 1970
621 ; , ; State v. Champagne, 251 La.
State v. Lasien 222 So. 2d 866 La. 1969
State v. Pagnotta 220 So. 2d 69 La. 1969
621 ; , ; State v. Champagne, 251 La.
State v. Vale 215 So. 2d 811 La. 1968
621 ; , ; State v. Champagne, 251 La.
State v. Champagne 206 So. 2d 518 La. 1968
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
we said: "It is now so firmly established in our jurisprudence that a defendant in a criminal case is not entitled to a pre-trial *512 inspection of written confessions of codefendants, written statements of witnesses, or police reports in the hands of the sheriff, the police department, or the distri
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
we said: “It is now so firmly established in our jurisprudence that a defendant in a criminal case is not entitled to a pre-trial inspection of written confessions of co-defendants, written statements of witnesses, or police reports in the hands of the sheriff, the police department, or the district a
State v. Brown 186 So. 2d 576 La. 1966
955 , ; , ; State v. Martinez, 220 La.
State v. Simien 178 So. 2d 266 La. 1965
State v. White 169 So. 2d 894 La. 1964
-349 , , and the numerous authorities there cited.
State v. White 169 So. 2d 894 La. 1964
-349 , , and the numerous authorities there cited.
City of Monroe v. Dozier 164 So. 2d 322 La. 1964
495 , ; , ; State v. McIlvaine, 245 La.
State v. Vines 162 So. 2d 332 La. 1964
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
State v. Richard 158 So. 2d 828 La. 1963
Villavasso v. Lincoln Beach Corporation 146 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
417: "* * * And it is only where there is no evidence at all upon some essential element of the crime charged that a question of law arises, vesting this court with appellate jurisdiction."
State v. Leierer 140 So. 2d 375 La. 1962
State v. Lewis 108 So. 2d 93 La. 1959
State v. Haddad (on rehearing), , 59 So.
State v. Weston 95 So. 2d 305 La. 1957
899 , ; , and State v. Shourds, 224 La.
State v. Goins 94 So. 2d 244 La. 1957
572 , ; , ; and State v. Palmer, 227 La.
State v. Blankenship 93 So. 2d 533 La. 1957
LRS 15:445 and 446; , ; and State v. Palmer, 227 La.
State v. Johnson 82 So. 2d 24 La. 1955
this Court stated: “The general rule is that evidence of the commission of a crime other than that charged in the indictment is not admissible, but Articles 445 and 446 provide exceptions to this general rule, and in the cases above cited this court admitted the evidence of subsequent offenses fo
State v. Jackson 81 So. 2d 5 La. 1955
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
State v. Paternostro 73 So. 2d 177 La. 1954