Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Poor v. Hemenway, 60 So. 2d 310.

13 citing documents.

MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
LaFleur v. Boyce MacHinery Corporation 294 So. 2d 498 La. 1974
Charles v. Dixie Auto Sales, Inc. 282 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1952); Johnson v. H. W. Parson Motors, Inc., (La.App.
Johnson v. HW Parson Motors, Inc. 231 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Campo v. LaNasa 173 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
1026 , ; , ; Krauss v. Fry, 209 La.
Bergeron v. Mid-City Motors, Inc. 162 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
510 , , , that a suit to rescind a sale for a redhibitory defect or other cause must fail when the purchaser has sold or otherwise used the property to such an extent that it cannot be returned to the seller in substantially the same condition as when sold.
Kennedy v. Jacobson-Young, Inc. 151 So. 2d 368 La. 1963
the defendant contends that the engine had been “dismantled” or “torn down” to such an extent that the car could not be, and was not, tendered in substantially the same condition as it was when received by plaintiff.
Kennedy v. Jacobson-Young, Inc. 144 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
the plaintiff sued to set aside the sale of a $13,500.00 yacht.
Dougherty v. Petrere 123 So. 2d 60 La. 1960
Elysian Homes, Inc. v. Davis 90 So. 2d 791 La. 1956
Madere v. Sharp 89 So. 2d 214 La. 1956
Cotton v. Washburn 84 So. 2d 208 La. 1955
Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. Futral, 204 La.
Reech v. Coco 65 So. 2d 790 La. 1953
510 ; , , that a suit to rescind a sale for a redhibitory defect or other cause must fail when the purchaser has sold or otherwise used the property to such an extent that it eannot be returned to the seller in substantially the same condition as when sold.