Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Alexandria v. La Combe, 57 So. 2d 206.

26 citing documents.

  • James Robert Wilber and Rachel Seals Wilber v. Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
  • Savage v. Prator 921 So. 2d 51 La. 2006
    In reaching its decision, this Court relied upon an analogous earlier case
  • State ex rel. Corbello v. Bond 441 So. 2d 742 La. 1983
  • Theriot v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 436 So. 2d 515 La. 1983
    (1952) held that the legislature had taken away the power to define gambling from cities with a population of less than 100,000 by enacting La.R.S.
  • Froeba v. State, Dept. of Public Safety 369 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    (1952); State v. Bradford, 220 La.
  • City of Shreveport v. Kaufman 353 So. 2d 995 La. 1977
    r to adopt ordinances for the suppression of lotteries, even though the Legislature itself has passed general and special laws concerning the same subject, it is difficult to perceive that the city ordinance is amenable to a charge that it is in direct conflict with the state law unless the latter can be regarded as covering `the entire subject matter.'" , (1952), on which defendant relies, pertained only to "Lawrason Act" cities and was inapplicable to cities with Home Rule Charters.
  • Harper v. State, Department of Revenue 328 So. 2d 669 La. 1976
    (1952); State v. Bradford, 220 La.
  • City of New Orleans v. Walker 327 So. 2d 386 La. 1976
    (1952) s}c * ‡ ” No substantial contention is advanced that this general state law did not su-percede and invalidate any municipal ordinance of New Orleans inconsistent or in conflict therewith.
  • State v. Suire 319 So. 2d 347 La. 1975
    ather, it relies on jurisprudence which, distinguishably from the present, invalidated local ordinances which were not authorized by general state law or which provided substantive regulation in conflict with or inconsistent with substantive regulation by state general law of the same subject matter: (1973); , (1952); and decisions cited therein.
  • State v. Wright 305 So. 2d 406 La. 1974
    (1952); State v. Bradford, 220 La.
  • State v. Sissons 292 So. 2d 523 La. 1974
    (1952); State v. Bradford, 220 La.
  • National Food Stores of Louisiana, Inc. v. Cefalu 280 So. 2d 903 La. 1973
    *908 , (1972), this Court considered the constitutionality of a municipal ordinance which on its face purported to prohibit non-commercialized gambling.
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Mahnken 257 So. 2d 690 La. 1972
  • McAllister v. City of New Orleans 231 So. 2d 368 La. 1970
  • 112 Grocery v. Cappel 228 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    23 , (1958): , (1952); Note, 15 Louisiana Law Review 472 (1955).
  • State ex rel. Superior Oil Co. v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. 128 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    226 , ; , ; 15 La.Law Rev. 472.
  • New Orleans Opera Guild, Inc. v. Local 174, Musicians Mutual Protective Union 127 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • City of Shreveport v. Baylock 107 So. 2d 419 La. 1958
    cited and relied on by relator, is inapposite.
  • State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
    * * *" See, also, , ; Chappuis v. Reggie, 222 La.
  • State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
    * * * ” See, also, , ; Chappuis v. Reggie, 222 La.
  • State Ex Rel. Fudickar v. Heard 65 So. 2d 112 La. 1953
    According to counsel’s argument, the fact that the language of the sections of the Revised Statutes under consideration is the same as that of the former acts — as distinguished from sections of the Revised Statutes which vary from their source, in which case the revision prevails, , — indicates a legislative intent that the reenactment have the same meaning as the earlier statute, including the judicial construction placed thereon prior to reenactment.
  • McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish 63 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    City of Alexandria v. La Combe, 1952, , .
  • City of New Orleans v. Stone 58 So. 2d 736 La. 1952
    3 , , hand *140 ed down on January 14th, 1952, it was held that an ordinance of the 'City of Alexandria, subjecting all gambling, whether conducted as a business or not, to punishment by fine and imprisonment, was ultra vires, being beyond the police power delegated to the city by the Legislature.
  • City of Alexandria v. Rexer 57 So. 2d 210 La. 1952
    For the reasons stated in the opinion in the consolidated cases of City of Alexandria v. LaCombe, City of Alexandria v. Ory, City of Alexandria v. Rexer, , .
  • City of Alexandria v. Clark 57 So. 2d 211 La. 1952
    For the reasons stated in the opinion in the consolidated cases of City of Alexandria v. LaCombe, City of Alexandria v. Ory, City of Alexandria v. Rexer, and *634 , , it is ordered that the conviction and sentence in the case of City of Alexandria v. Clark, No. 40,544 of the docket of this Court, he and the same is hereby reversed, set aside and annulled and it is further ordered that the accused, the said Bill Clark be discharged and released from custody.
  • City of Alexandria v. Ory 57 So. 2d 210 La. 1952
    For the reasons stated in the opinion in the consolidated cases of City of Alex *632 andria v. LaCombe, City of Alexandria v. Ory, City of Alexandria v. Rexer, , .