Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roy, 58 So. 2d 323.

16 citing documents.

State v. WALSTRUM 36 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana courts have compelled a defendant to put on a shirt, (per curiam); to allow his height to be measured, -30 , -28 (1952); to exhibit a scar, to exhibit a bruise, and to exhibit a tattoo.
State v. Hutchinson 817 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Hearold 567 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Barnes 365 So. 2d 1282 La. 1978
679 , 21 L.Ed.2d 691 ; and to allow his height to be measured, , (1952).
State v. Ballard 351 So. 2d 484 La. 1977
While a demonstration during closing argument is permissible if founded on the evidence, , (1952), the possibility of prejudice by the present demonstration is real.
State v. Tillett 351 So. 2d 1153 La. 1977
1976); to allow his height to be measured, , (1952); and to exhibit a scar, a bruise, (La.
State v. Lee 331 So. 2d 455 La. 1976
n note two other substantial issues raised: Assignment 9, the denial of a new trial despite production of two previously unavailable witnesses who substantially contradicted trial testimony of the decedent's wife, the state's chief witness (see Footnote 1); and Assignment 6, the refusal to permit a demonstration before the jury by defense counsel of the operation of the shotgun, , (1952).
State v. O'CONNER 320 So. 2d 188 La. 1975
331 , (1970), accused forced to reveal scar on arm; , (1952), defendant compelled to have her height measured before the jury; State v. Prudhomme, 25 La.Ann.
State v. Mixon 248 So. 2d 307 La. 1971
State v. Robinson, 221 La.
State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
697 , (1970); have her height measured before the jury, , (1952); exhibit his feet for comparison with foot tracks, State v. Prudhomme, 25 La.Ann.
State v. Junius 242 So. 2d 533 La. 1970
State v. Lacoste 237 So. 2d 871 La. 1970
In 1952, , , this Court, after a thorough review of the jurisprudence, held that compelling a defendant to have her height measured before the jury did not violate her constitutional protection under Art. I, Sec.
State v. Hughes 154 So. 2d 395 La. 1963
126; , ; State v. Robinson, 221 La.
State v. McAllister 150 So. 2d 557 La. 1963
384 , , , ): “The evidence showed that there were' several Deputies who were not named as witnesses in the case but who had had various contact in some manner with the case who were available to serve during the trial of the case, and it is to the knowledge of the Court that some of them did.
State v. Brown 136 So. 2d 394 La. 1962
629 , ; , ; State v. Jackson, 153 La.
State v. Robinson 58 So. 2d 408 La. 1952
For an excellent discussion of this subject, , , and People v. One 1941 Mercury Sedan, 74 Cal.App.2d 199 , 168 P.2d 443 .