Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Richardson, 56 So. 2d 568.

30 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Raymond Daniel Lowrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
So.2d 568 (1951); State v. Foster, 156 La.
State v. Lowrey 228 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(1951); State v. Foster, 156 La.
State v. Knowles 392 So. 2d 651 La. 1980
(1951); State v. Foster, 156 La.
State v. Breston 304 So. 2d 313 La. 1974
State v. Manuel 289 So. 2d 498 La. 1974
State v. Glover 263 So. 2d 866 La. 1972
State v. Normand 242 So. 2d 245 La. 1971
70 , , this court, , , that perfected bills of exception are required in applications for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus in criminal cases, denied the application on the basis of this determination.
State v. Lawrence 241 So. 2d 529 La. 1970
See, Articles 843, 844, and 845 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; , ; State v. Foret, 245 La.
State v. Wyche 191 So. 2d 496 La. 1966
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Wyche 190 So. 2d 915 La. 1966
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Fitzgerald 179 So. 2d 906 La. 1965
State v. Anderson 179 So. 2d 15 La. 1965
15:498-15:504; , ; State v. LeBleu, 203 La.
State v. Polland 174 So. 2d 132 La. 1965
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Bradford 174 So. 2d 132 La. 1965
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Amos 174 So. 2d 132 La. 1965
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Spivey 174 So. 2d 132 La. 1965
IS :499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Green 162 So. 2d 573 La. 1964
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Green 162 So. 2d 574 La. 1964
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Green 162 So. 2d 574 La. 1964
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Green 162 So. 2d 573 La. 1964
15:499; , ; State v. McDonald, 218 La.
State v. Maricle 158 So. 2d 604 La. 1963
nces of the case, appellant should be allowed a reasonable time to give notice to the judge of the Juvenile Court of his intention, if it is his desire, to apply to this Court for a writ of certiorari or review in order that he may be granted a stay of further proceedings during the interval in which his application may be filed here and his bills of exceptions perfected ( , ) con-formably with Section 2 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court.
State v. Foret 157 So. 2d 733 La. 1963
we said that a defendant who comes before this court by way of application for writs would be in no better position than one who comes by appeal.
State v. Foret 156 So. 2d 606 La. 1963
State v. Scheler 144 So. 2d 389 La. 1962
660 , ; , ; State v. Murff, 215 La.
State v. Collins 138 So. 2d 546 La. 1962
and cases cited in 220 La.
State v. McCrory 112 So. 2d 432 La. 1959
40 , ; , and State v. Scheuering, 226 La, 660, .
State v. Scheuering 76 So. 2d 921 La. 1954
State v. Scheuering 76 So. 2d 921 La. 1954
State v. Vittoria 69 So. 2d 36 La. 1953
State v. Ysasi 64 So. 2d 213 La. 1953