Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Acadian Production Corp. v. Savanna Corp., 63 So. 2d 141.

20 citing documents.

Susie Winters v. Otha C. Dodson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
v. Savanna Corp., So.2d 141 (1953).
Winters v. Dodson 896 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
v. Savanna Corp., , (1953).
Walker v. Nobile 606 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
v. Savanna Corp., , (1953); Russ v. United Farm Equipment Co., 230 La.
Kemna v. Warren 514 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
v. Savanna Corp., , (1953); Russ v. United Farm Equipment Co., 230 La.
McCarty v. Panzico 467 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
at 143 (1953) and numerous citations therein.
First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Mercer 448 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
v. Savanna Corp., , (1953); Cuselich v. Cuselich, 159 La.
Greenleaf Plantation, Inc. v. Kieffer 403 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
v. Savanna Corp., So.2d 141 (1953).
STANDARD CO., ETC. v. Elliott Const. Co., Inc. 363 So. 2d 671 La. 1978
v. Savanna Corp., -626 , (1953).
Reed v. Meaux 292 So. 2d 557 La. 1974
(1953) (sale under writ of fieri facias; no notice to debtor; fraud)."
Louisiana National Bank of Baton Rouge v. Heroman 280 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
"See also, , (1953), citing Grove v. Harvey, supra, as authority for its conclusion that subsequent ratification by a corporation is retroactive in effect and equivalent to prior authority.
Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc. 236 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1953), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a contract entered into or other transaction engaged in without authorization from governing authorities of a corporation may be ratified either expressly or by implication of those having the authority, provided the action was not prohibited by the corporat
Bordelon v. Bordelon 180 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
Process Installation, Inc. v. Bio Chemical Research & Development Corp. 173 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Where, however, the corporation promptly expresses its disapproval of the unauthorized act, any delay in asserting its rights will not be deemed as a ratification.’ “A recent Louisiana case which states the jurisprudence of this State on the subject is that of Acadian Production Corporation (of Louisiana) v. Savananna (sic) Corporation, , : “ ‘It is the universally accepted and recognized rule that contracts entered into or other transactions engaged in without authorization from the governing a
Succession of Hoffman 141 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Dunham-Pugh Co. v. Stephens 99 So. 2d 88 La. 1958
Where, however, the corporation promptly expresses its disapproval of the unauthorized act, any delay in asserting its rights will not be deemed as a ratification.’ “A recent Louisiana case which states the jurisprudence of this State on the subject is that of Acadian Products Corporation [of Louisiana] v. Savananna Corporation, , : “ ‘It is the universally accepted and recognized rule that contracts entered into or other transactions engaged in without authorization from the governing authoriti
Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 88 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
446 , ; , ; Stacy v. Midstates Oil Corp., 214 La.
Russ v. United Farm Equipment Co. 89 So. 2d 380 La. 1956
and authorities cited therein.
Union Oil Company of California v. Touchet 86 So. 2d 50 La. 1956
LSA-Civil Code Article 1840; , (and cases therein cited).
Acadian Production Corp. v. Savanna Corp. 77 So. 2d 417 La. 1954
Corp., , , wherein wé annulled and set aside the judgment of the lower court dismissing plaintiff’s suit ori Exceptions of no cause or right of action, and remanded the casé fór trial on the merits; and it is now before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal taken by the plaintiff’s attorneys, John T. Charbonnet a
Breaux v. Laird 65 So. 2d 907 La. 1953
v. Savanna Corp. , ; Stacy v. Midstates Oil Corp., 214 La.