Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Fields, 62 So. 2d 495.

25 citing documents.

Succession of Willie C. Burns La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2021
Pierce v. Ellis 519 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
is one of sufficiency or preponderance of testimony rather than the credibility of witnesses, the rule that the judgment of the trial court on questions of fact will not be disturbed unless manifestly erroneous, is not applicable, in view of the fact that the trial court has no advantage over the appellate court in weighing the testimony and giving it proper effect, citing Succession of Fields, [ ]
Succession of Cohen 480 So. 2d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Finally, following the rule of , (1952), he awarded one-half of the entire community to Miriam, and the other half to Jeannette.
Gathright v. Smith 368 So. 2d 679 La. 1979
See, e. g., , (1952); Ray v. Knox, 164 La.
Super v. Burke 367 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
*96 (1952); Succession of Pigg, 228 La.
Succession of Zinsel 360 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(1952); Succession of Pigg, 228 La.
Price v. Price 326 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
1 Cir. 1939); , (1952); Prince v. Hopson, 230 La.
Cucinella v. Peninsular Fire Insurance 324 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1952); Roder v. Pelican Rice Co., Ct.App.Orleans, 10 Orleans App. 120 (1913); (La.App.
King v. Cancienne 316 So. 2d 366 La. 1975
575 , (1956); , (1952); Succession of Chavis, supra ; Patton v. City of Philadelphia and New Orleans, 1 La.
Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
575 , (1956); , (1952); Succession of Chavis, supra; Patton v. City of Philadelphia and New Orleans, 1 La.Ann.
Cortes v. Fleming 267 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
1083 , (1949); , (1952); Prince v. Hopson, 230 La.
Blue Streak Enterprises v. Cherrie 263 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
(1952); Roder v. Pelican Rice Co., Ct.App.Orleans, 10 Orleans App. 120 (1913); (La.App.
Succession of Choyce 183 So. 2d 457 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
(1952); Texas Co. v. Stewart (La.App.Orl.1958, cert.
Succession of Jene 173 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Succession of Pigg, 228 La.
Town of Slidell v. Temple 164 So. 2d 276 La. 1964
In , (1952), the court stated: ‘Counsel for defendant makes reference to 500 cases or more to the effect that a judgment of the trial court on questions of fact will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly erroneous.’ In The Work of the Louisiana Supreme Court for the 1946-47 Term — Civil Proc
Melancon v. Sonnier 157 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
Succession of Chavis, 211 La.
Fortenberry v. Scogin 149 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In , (1952), the court stated: `Counsel for defendant makes reference to 500 cases or more to the effect that a judgment of the trial court on questions of fact will not be disturbed on appeal unless manifestly erroneous.'
Succession of Davis 142 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
313 , (1947); , (1952); Succession of Pigg, 228 La.
Succession of Jones 136 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Succession of Hopkins 114 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Loew's, Incorporated v. Don George, Inc. 110 So. 2d 553 La. 1959
This prayer clearly indicates an election on his part to waive his right to recover for the defendants’ unlawful acts and limit his demand to a suit in quasi contract for the restitution of his property.” , ; Masera v. Rosedale Inn, La.App., ; Succession of Savant, 15 La.App.
Sollberger v. Walcott 101 So. 2d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
absence of manifest error, most ably urges that, nevertheless, the appellate courts of Louisiana, being charged with the duty of reviewing the facts as well as the law, can and should reverse factual decisions if reaching a different conclusion than the trial court as to "the sufficiency or the preponderance of the testimony rather than of the credibility of the witnesses," , at page 498.
Texas Company v. Stewart 101 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1958
Prince v. Hopson 89 So. 2d 128 La. 1956
Succession of Verrett 70 So. 2d 89 La. 1953