Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Succession of Nunley, 69 So. 2d 33.

25 citing documents.

Succession of Charles Ray Middlebrooks, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2024
In -57, (1954) (emphasis added)(citations omitted), the supreme court stated: The fact that an olographic will, shown to have been in the possession of or accessible to the deceased, cannot be found at his death, gives rise to a legal presumption of revocation by destructio
In Re: The Succession Of Diana Bartlett Morgan La. 2023
1988) ( So.2d 33 (1954)).
Succession of Frank Anthony Messina, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
App. 2 Cir. 8/23/96), citing Succession of Talbot, supra; (La.
Succession of Elizabeth Smith Foster . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
App. 1 Cir. 11/3/00), (in turn So.2d 33, 35 (1953))).
Succession of Dalier 19 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
1 Cir. 11/3/00), , , (1953).
Succession of Jeffrey Joseph Deshotel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
The appellants contend that this presumption arises under and when the proponent of a will cannot produce the original of that will.
In Re Succession of Deshotel 10 So. 3d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
The appellants contend that this presumption arises under and , (1953), when the proponent of a will cannot produce the original of that will.
In Re Succession of Garlington 939 So. 2d 633 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Succession of Betty Deville Sharp Garlington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
In Re Succession of Hatchell 868 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
1 Cir. 11/3/00), , writs denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.2/16/01), and XXXX-XXXX (La.2/16/01), ( , (1953)).
In Re Succession of Claiborne 769 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Succession of Justice 679 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Hamilton v. Kelley 641 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
DISCUSSION In , (1953), a lost will was allowed to be probated.
Succession of Talbot 530 So. 2d 1132 La. 1988
Succession of Holloway 531 So. 2d 431 La. 1988
(1954); Succession of O'Brien, 168 La.
Succession of Bagwell 415 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
(1953); Succession of O'Brien, 168 La.
Succession of Brumfield 401 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Succession of Davis 347 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Boyd involved proving the date of an olographic will by extrinsic evidence but the court in its opinion talked of , (1954), in which the entire contents of the will were proven by extrinsic evidence when the original was lost.
Rivette v. Moreau 341 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1954) was relied upon by the trial court to place the burden of proof on the proponents of Mrs. Moreau's statutory will to prove absence of revocation.
Succession of Boyd 306 So. 2d 687 La. 1975
In the , (1954), extraneous evidence was permitted to prove the entire contents of a will the original of which had disappeared.
Succession of Boyd 295 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
874 (1929) and , (1953).
Airey v. Sampson 263 So. 2d 330 La. 1972
184 , ; , ; Succession of O’Brien, 168 La.
Succession of Holms 170 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
The Supreme Court in , , held that the fact that an olographic will, shown to have been in the possession of or accessible to the deceased, cannot be found at his death, gives rise to a legal presumption of revocation by destruction, but that this presumption is a rebuttable one.
Succession of Gaudin 140 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In a similar case in , (1953), the court admitted to probate the attorney’s typewritten copy of an olographic will which was lost by the testatrix prior to her demise.
Jones v. Mason 99 So. 2d 46 La. 1958
The trial judge so held, relying on a principle of law announced by this court in , .