Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hillard v. Hillard, 73 So. 2d 442.

21 citing documents.

  • Bordelon v. Management Co., Inc. 649 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Nelson v. Nelson 377 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    ” , (1954); Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
  • Hingle v. Hingle 369 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    119, which survive at least in part until final divorce, Hillard v. Hillard, 1954, , , and in consonance *272 with Whitt v. Vauthier, La.App.
  • Holliday v. Holliday 358 So. 2d 618 La. 1978
    421 , (1958); , (1954); Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
  • Cox v. Cox 341 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Articles 119, 136, 139 Civil Code; , (1954).
  • Golson v. Golson 341 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    and Boucvalt v. Boucvalt, 235 La.
  • Ward v. Ward 339 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
  • Followed Delaney v. Delaney 339 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    172 (1937); , (1954); Stevens v. Stevens, supra, LSA-C.C.
  • Ward v. Ward 332 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    158 , ; , ; Bloodworth v. Bloodworth, La.
  • Williams v. Williams 331 So. 2d 438 La. 1976
    [1] , (1954); 13 La.L.Rev.
  • Adams v. Adams 243 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    172 (1937); , (1954); Stevens v. Stevens, supra, LSA-C.C.
  • McMath v. Masters 198 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • Nelson v. Walker 197 So. 2d 619 La. 1967
  • Keneson v. Madeley 185 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Russ v. Russ, La.App., .
  • Smith v. Smith 179 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    guishing differences above-noted in the Jefferson and Rapides suits' demands, as well as because a Jefferson Parish judgment for alimony and child support in the earlier separation suit could not be res judicata as to the Rapides Parish court in its determination of alimony and child support upon decreeing a final divorce in the second suit (Thornton v. Floyd, cited above; , ).
  • Fontenot v. Fontenot 175 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    421 , ; , ; Anzalone *440 v. Anzalone, 182 La.
  • Cordaro v. Cordaro 168 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    (1954); Shapiro v. Shapiro (La.App.
  • St. Julien v. LeBlanc 146 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
  • Shapiro v. Shapiro 141 So. 2d 448 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Arnold v. Arnold, 186 La.
  • Boucvalt v. Boucvalt 104 So. 2d 157 La. 1958
    This court, however, , , citing a similar holding in Anzalone v. Anzalone, 182 La.
  • Murphy v. Murphy 87 So. 2d 4 La. 1956
    172 ; Eals v. Swan, supra, and cases therein cited; , .