Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Buxton v. McKendrick, 64 So. 2d 844.

31 citing documents.

Bass v. Coupel 671 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Boucher v. Division Of Employment Security, Department of Labor, (La.App.
Bunge Corp. v. Gatx Corp. 557 So. 2d 1376 La. 1990
Moresi v. STATE, DEPT. OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES 552 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Henry v. State, Department of Health & Human Resources 482 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Henry v. STATE, DEPT. OF H. & H. RES. 482 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Brumfield v. Brumfield 477 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Stern v. Kreeger Store, Inc. 463 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Deville v. Leonards 457 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
Automatic Coin Enterprises, Inc. v. Vend-Tronics, Inc. 433 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
Hensley v. Miley 408 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
LSA-Civ.Code Art. 2547; , Tauzin v. Sam Broussard, Inc., (La.App.
Mitchell v. Bertolla 397 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
Hall, supra ; , (1953); Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
Hall v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co. 368 So. 2d 984 La. 1979
Capital Bank & Trust Co. v. Core 343 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
861 (1925); , (1953); and other authorities.
COTTON STATES CHEM. CO., INC. v. Larrison Enterprises, Inc. 342 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Packwood v. Johnson 264 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1953) and Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
Ross v. Justice 229 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Boucher v. Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 169 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Farwell v. Milliken & Farwell, Inc. 145 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
Willis v. Gordon 143 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
.” Again the Supreme Court in American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., 208 La.
Collier v. Administrator, Succession of Blevins 136 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
811 , ; , ; American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co., Inc., 208 La.
Wood v. Morgan Bros. 135 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
(1953); Sanders v. Sanders, 222 La.
Walton v. Bufkin 135 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
aud, counsel relies upon *311 the well established principles that fraud is never presumed; that one alleging fraud must prove the same by legal and convincing evidence, and that the probable existence of fraud or establishment of circumstances of a suspicious character is not sufficient, since the proof required must be stronger than a mere preponderance of evidence; , ; LSA-C.C.
Colvin v. Division of Employment Security 132 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Guidry v. Hub City Motors, Inc. 122 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
92 ; Buxton v. McKendrick, 1953, , ; Swain v. Lindsay, La.App.1956, ; and Orr v. Walker, La.App.1958, .
State ex rel. Sales v. Ray 111 So. 2d 786 La. 1959
Glover v. Henry 107 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
West v. Kerksieck 104 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Orr v. Walker 104 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
388 .” , (citing the Slocomb case as authority).
Castille v. Champ Auto Sales, Inc. 92 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
the Supreme Court said: “ ‘Two things are necessary to constitute fraud: the intention to defraud, and actual loss or damage, or such strong probability of it as will induce a court to interfere.’ ” Left for consideration is the question of whether, assuming that the representation was made to th
La Croix v. Recknagel 89 So. 2d 363 La. 1956
McClatchey v. Guaranty Bank & Trust Company 85 So. 2d 6 La. 1955
438 ; Woodward v. Barringer, La.App., .” , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by