Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Beene v. Pardue, 65 So. 2d 897.
-
Catlett v. Catlett
96 So. 2d 330
La. 1957
401 , and cited cases.” , .
-
Thomas v. Southdown Sugars, Inc.
90 So. 2d 682
La. 1956
418 , ; Castleberry v. Ethridge, 223 La.
-
Camus v. Camus
89 So. 2d 771
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
793 , ; , , decided June 1, 1953.” In Beene v. Pardue, cited in the Wainer case, the Supreme Court said: “Nowhere in the record other than in the stipulation referred to and in the affidavits filed in this Court is it shown what the value of the strip of land in contest is.
-
Russ v. Stephens
89 So. 2d 213
La. 1956
708 , ; , ; Castleberry v. Ethridge, 223 La.
-
Winsberg v. Winsberg
85 So. 2d 31
La. 1956
11 , ; , ; Castle-berry v. Ethridge, 223 La.
-
Johnson v. Nora
83 So. 2d 643
La. 1955
and authorities therein cited.
-
Gamburg v. City of Alexandria
80 So. 2d 372
La. 1955
466 , ; , ; Dupre v. Dupre, 224 La.
-
Gaylord Container Corp. v. Stilley
79 So. 2d 109
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
613 , ; even though, as in the Beene case, all parties thereto had agreed both by stipulation in the District Court and by affidavits earlier filed in the Supreme Court, , , that the value in dispute was at least $2,500.
- Beene v. Pardue 79 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
- Beene v. Pardue 76 So. 2d 902 La. 1954
-
Sharp v. Sharp
72 So. 2d 580
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Appellate courts will not give consideration to affidavits as to the value of property involved, , .
-
State ex rel. Schwehm v. Morrison
70 So. 2d 881
La. 1954
466 , ; , ; Dupre v. Dupre, 224 La.
-
Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. of Alexandria v. Smith
69 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1953
Following the rule applicable to such a situation as enunciated and maintained by the Supreme Court of Louisiana, , , we feel that the proper procedure in the instant case is to remand the same in order to permit the introduction of competent evidence fixing the value of the property in dispute as of the time of the trial.
-
Dupre v. Dupre
68 So. 2d 773
La. 1953
On joint motion of counsel for plaintiffappellee, Alfred Dupre, and defendant-appellant, Adam Dupre, to transfer the appeal in this case to the Court of Appeal, , , for the reason that the amount in dispute is not affirmatively shown to exceed $2,000, and the statement by appellee, joined in and verified by appellant, that the record fails to disclose the value of the strip of land in contest as well as the assertion that neither plaintiff nor defendant has ever
-
Beene v. Pardue
67 So. 2d 337
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
An appeal from the judgment of the district court was first taken to the Supreme Court and by that tribunal transferred to this court, , .
-
Wainer v. Kirn
66 So. 2d 587
La. 1953
793 , ; , , decided June 1, 1953.