Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Gomez, 67 So. 2d 156.
- In re the Succession of Odum 760 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-
Succession of Causey v. Causey
569 So. 2d 665
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Succession of Gomez (Gomez I), , (1953); (La.
- Arsht v. Davis 561 So. 2d 58 La. 1990
-
Succession of Fakier
541 So. 2d 1372
La. 1988
Succession of Gomez (Gomez I), , (1953).
- Succession of Fakier 509 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
- Succession of Riggio 468 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
-
Succession of Lomonaco
465 So. 2d 781
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
The Supreme Court in , (1953), held that a manual gift as such is not exempt from collation, but the donor may dispense the gift from collation.
-
Succession of Duvio
449 So. 2d 147
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
In , (1953) the court established a second method for indicating the dispensation from collation.
-
Succession of Skye
417 So. 2d 1221
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
However, , (1953), decided otherwise.
-
In Succession of Simms
371 So. 2d 272
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Articles 1242, 1243, 1244 and 1245 and their history as related in , (1953), that she was not obligated to do so.
-
Succession of Pierson
339 So. 2d 1337
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
In , (1953) appears a thorough discussion of the legal exemptions from collation provided by Civil Code Articles 1244 and 1245.
-
Ocmand v. Case
281 So. 2d 855
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
tor discovered that certain checks had been written by the deceased payable to Mrs. Leland O. Case and when the detailed descriptive list of the assets of the succession was filed these items for which collation is sought were set forth as follows: “Items to be collated or brought back to the estate to determine the Active Mass under 1505 Civil Code and Succession of Gomez (1955) and (1953): “1.
- Succession of Browne 176 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
- Succession of Gomez 78 So. 2d 411 La. 1955
- Succession of Nelson 70 So. 2d 665 La. 1953