Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glorioso v. Glorioso, 65 So. 2d 794.

22 citing documents.

First Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Dooley 535 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Slater v. Slater 410 So. 2d 1197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1953), rehearing denied; (La.App.
Donica v. Donica 347 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(Emphasis added) “ , , in which the wife, as plaintiff in reconvention, was successful in her demand for a separation from bed and board.
Richard v. Richard 340 So. 2d 1104 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
State v. Peters 315 So. 2d 678 La. 1975
Naquin v. Maryland Casualty Company 311 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Lagarde v. Connell 279 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Strother v. Strother 248 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
The defendant husband cites Estrade v. Chandler, La.App., (4th Cir. 1968) , (1953) which hold that the fee of the wife’s attorney in a suit for separation from bed and board is a debt of the community and not a personal obliga *867 tion of the husband and, furthermore, that in the absence of proof of the existence of community assets, there can be no award to the wife for attor
Hanford v. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. 232 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1953); Karisny v. Sunshine Biscuits, Inc., (La.App.
Robichaux v. Dibartolo 224 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
It appears to be well settled as a general rule that attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the wife in prosecuting a suit for separation of bed and board or divorce are an obligation of the community, whether she is successful in the proceedings or not, the obligations being community debts, , (1953), rehearing denied.
Bordelon v. Bordelon 218 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Estrade v. Chandler 211 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Tooley v. Pennison 208 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Caldwell Bros. Real Estate, Inc. 169 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
State, Department of Highways v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. 168 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Smith v. Smith 148 So. 2d 827 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Shockley v. Shockley 141 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
203 , (1948); , (1953); Tanner v. Tanner, 229 La.
Meyer v. Howard 136 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Succession of Thibodeaux 116 So. 2d 525 La. 1959
812 , ; , ; Franklin v. Greyhound Corp., La.App., ; Miller v. W. Horace Williams, La.App., .
Thigpen v. Thigpen 91 So. 2d 12 La. 1956
Although it is now well settled that the attorney’s fees of the wife in separation and divorce proceedings are chargeable only against the community, , and Tanner v. Tanner, 229 La.
Tanner v. Tanner 86 So. 2d 80 La. 1956
in which the wife, as plaintiff in reconvention, was successful in her demand for a separation from bed and board.
Callahan v. Callais 71 So. 2d 320 La. 1954