Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Texas Pipe Line Co. v. Johnson, 65 So. 2d 884.

17 citing documents.

Nichols v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 933 So. 2d 786 La. 2006
(1953); Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, (La.App.
Love v. AAA Temporaries, Inc. 858 So. 2d 410 La. 2003
(1953); Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, , writs denied, 94-0287 (La.3/25/94), , and 94-0753 (La.5/6/94), .
Reggio v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 333 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
“A. I would not think so at this point, but I think that ultimately in six months to a year and a half that he will, we will just have to wait and find out.” As was stated in Herbert, supra, , (1953), a remand of a case to receive newly discovered evidence should be “sparingly exercised”.
Nolte v. Nolte 258 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
“As a general rule, the Courts of Appeal have the right to remand cases for new trial, additional evidence, etc., to prevent a miscarriage of justice.” McKinney v. Levy, La.App., (3d Cir. 1968); Texas Pipe Line Co. *121 v. Johnson, , (1953); Bayou Rapides Lumber Co. v. Campbell, 215 La.
Mid-City Investment Co. v. Batiste 248 So. 2d 88 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
38 A.L.R.2d 785 ; Kinnebrew v. Louisiana Ice Co., 216 La.
B. Stern Co. v. Perry 246 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
38 A.L.R.2d 785 ; Kinnebrew v. Louisiana Ice Co., 216 La.
Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 232 So. 2d 463 La. 1970
38 A.L.R.2d 785 ; Kinnebrew v. Louisiana Ice Co., 216 La.
Nereaux v. Rivet 228 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
38 A.L.R.2d 785 ; Vines v. Allen, La.App.
McKinney v. Levy 212 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
38 A.L.R.2d 785 ; ; Whitten v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., .
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
38 A. L.R.2d 785 (1953); Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, supra; , La.App., 1st Cir.1954; , La.App., 4th Cir.1962; Central Louisiana Electric Company v. Fontenot, 159 So.2d
Griffin v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 189 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
548 ; , , 38 A.L.R.2d 785 .
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Roy 198 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
“ , , 38 A.L.R.2d 785 (1953); Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons, supra; *488 , La.App., 1st Cir. 1954; Louisiana Power & , La.App., 4th Cir. 1962; Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Fontenot, 159 So.2d
Gallagher v. Gallagher 181 So. 2d 47 La. 1965
2d 75 (1962); , , 38 A.L.R.2d 785 (1953); (La.
Central Louisiana Electric Company v. Fontenot 159 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
App. 1 Cir., ; , , 38 A.L.R.2d 785 .
Louisiana Power and Light Company v. BOUCHEL 143 So. 2d 270 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Fuselier 133 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
485 , , , 38 A.L.R.2d 785 involved destruction of growing crops destroyed by the expropriating authority.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Simmons 85 So. 2d 251 La. 1956
38 A.L.R.2d 785 , where the plaintiff paid only one-third of the market value of the land expropriated for a right of way.