Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board, 64 So. 2d 839.
-
Board of Commissioners v. Estate of Smith
881 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Humble Oil & , (1953).
-
Arkla Exploration Co. v. Delacroix Corp.
650 So. 2d 777
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
(1953), "The Duck Lake Case", and Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board 202 La.
-
Delacroix Corp. v. Jones-O'Brien, Inc.
597 So. 2d 65
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Citing Humble Oil & , "The Duck Lake Case", and Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board, 202 La.
-
Hero Lands Co. v. Board of Commissioners
366 So. 2d 593
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Humble Oil & , (1953).
-
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board
317 So. 2d 576
La. 1975
However, this Court in Price and in Humble Oil & , (1953) upon which it relied, [4] (1961), concluded that the private landowners in those cases had acquired title to the beds of navigable waters by virtue of Act No. 62 of 1912.
-
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Delacroix Corporation
285 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
We refer to Humble Oil & , (1953); California Company v. Price, 225 La.
-
Stevens v. State Mineral Board
233 So. 2d 542
La. 1970
( , ; California Company v. Price et al., 225 La.
-
Stevens v. State Mineral Board
221 So. 2d 645
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Therefore, the facts in the instant case are similar to those in Humble Oil & , , which involved a transfer by a political subdivision, the Atchafalaya Levee District, to private parties.
- Coastal States Gas Producing Co. v. State Mineral Bd. 199 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
-
St. Mary Parish Land Company v. State Mineral Bd.
167 So. 2d 509
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
9:5661) To the same effect are Humble Oil & , ; Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board, supra; O'Brien v. State Mineral Board, supra; California Company v. Price, 225 La.
-
State v. Cenac
132 So. 2d 928
La. 1961
266 , (1946); Humble Oil & , (1953); and California Co. v. Price, 225 La.
-
State v. Cenac
132 So. 2d 928
La. 1961
266 , (1946); Humble Oil & , (1953); and California Co. v. Price, 225 La.
-
State v. Cenac
132 So. 2d 897
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
266 , , and Humble Oil & , , were all incorrectly decided and should be overruled.
-
Olin Gas Transmission Corporation v. Harrison
132 So. 2d 721
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
266 , ; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board et al., 1953, , ; California Company v. Price et al., 1954, 225 La.
-
California Co. v. Price
74 So. 2d 1
La. 1954
In the latter class was the bed of Duck Lake, a navigable body of water, which furnished the contest in the recent case of Humble Oil & , (such decision, it is fair to state, was rendered subsequent to the judgment of the district court in the instant cause).