Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board, 64 So. 2d 839.

15 citing documents.

  • Board of Commissioners v. Estate of Smith 881 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Humble Oil & , (1953).
  • Arkla Exploration Co. v. Delacroix Corp. 650 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    (1953), "The Duck Lake Case", and Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board 202 La.
  • Delacroix Corp. v. Jones-O'Brien, Inc. 597 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    Citing Humble Oil & , "The Duck Lake Case", and Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board, 202 La.
  • Hero Lands Co. v. Board of Commissioners 366 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    Humble Oil & , (1953).
  • Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
    However, this Court in Price and in Humble Oil & , (1953) upon which it relied, [4] (1961), concluded that the private landowners in those cases had acquired title to the beds of navigable waters by virtue of Act No. 62 of 1912.
  • Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Delacroix Corporation 285 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    We refer to Humble Oil & , (1953); California Company v. Price, 225 La.
  • Stevens v. State Mineral Board 233 So. 2d 542 La. 1970
    ( , ; California Company v. Price et al., 225 La.
  • Stevens v. State Mineral Board 221 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Therefore, the facts in the instant case are similar to those in Humble Oil & , , which involved a transfer by a political subdivision, the Atchafalaya Levee District, to private parties.
  • Coastal States Gas Producing Co. v. State Mineral Bd. 199 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
  • St. Mary Parish Land Company v. State Mineral Bd. 167 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    9:5661) To the same effect are Humble Oil & , ; Realty Operators v. State Mineral Board, supra; O'Brien v. State Mineral Board, supra; California Company v. Price, 225 La.
  • State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
    266 , (1946); Humble Oil & , (1953); and California Co. v. Price, 225 La.
  • State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 928 La. 1961
    266 , (1946); Humble Oil & , (1953); and California Co. v. Price, 225 La.
  • State v. Cenac 132 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    266 , , and Humble Oil & , , were all incorrectly decided and should be overruled.
  • Olin Gas Transmission Corporation v. Harrison 132 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    266 , ; Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. State Mineral Board et al., 1953, , ; California Company v. Price et al., 1954, 225 La.
  • California Co. v. Price 74 So. 2d 1 La. 1954
    In the latter class was the bed of Duck Lake, a navigable body of water, which furnished the contest in the recent case of Humble Oil & , (such decision, it is fair to state, was rendered subsequent to the judgment of the district court in the instant cause).