Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Troquille v. Lacaze's Estate, 63 So. 2d 139.

18 citing documents.

Toth v. Ensco Environmental Services, Inc. 546 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Mini Togs Products, Inc. v. Wallace 513 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
730 , (1958); , (1953); Town of Vinton v. Lyons, 131 La.
Segura v. Leleux 158 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
2d Cir.) (farming), modified on other grounds, , .
Venable v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 142 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1048 , ); that where the contract provides for an hourly rate of pay and the employee usually worked more than eight hours a day, a full working day is the number of hours usually worked (Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate, , ); and similarly, that in piece work cases the daily rate of pay is the amount usually earned in a full working day (Collins v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company, La.App., ) ; but there is no reported case dealing with *644 the situation where the rate of pay was daily (not hou
Effler v. Edwards 142 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
As stated by our learned brothers of the second circuit in the case of Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate, La.App., at page 507 (modified on other grounds, , ): “We concede, as a general proposition, that the occupation of farming is not, per se, hazardous under the Workmen’s Compensation Statute, LSA-R.S.
Shuff v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Gill v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc. 132 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
See Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate, , which is identical to the instant case in that plaintiff regularly worked nine hours per day.
Hoffman v. City of New Orleans 125 So. 2d 774 La. 1961
531 , (where the employee worked under a contract of hiring for one day a week) ; Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate et al., , ; Caddo Contracting Company v. Johnson et al., 222 La.
Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Company 125 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
See also: Troquille v. Lacaze's Estate, 1953, , 63 So.
Hatten v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. 112 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Miller v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., .
Sepulvado v. Argonaut Underwriters Insurance Co. 111 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
531 , ; Troquille v. Lacaze’s Estate, 1953, , ; Caddo Contracting Company v. Johnson, 1953, 222 La.
Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 99 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
In the Troquille case, , , the Supreme Court held that plaintiff was entitled to compensation based on a six-day week at a daily rate of pay of $6.75.
Guillory v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 95 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
939 , , , , Jarrell v. Travelers Ins.
Freeman v. Clark 88 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
1952, ; Troquille v. Lacaze’s *422 Estate, La.App.1952, , Id., 1953, , ; Edwards v. Louisiana Forestry Commission, 1952, 221 La.
Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters 89 So. 2d 399 La. 1956
Tate v. Gullett Gin Company & Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. 86 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
To compute the weekly wages for purposes of fixing the compensation rate, a six day week should be used when the employee does not work any fixed number of days per week, , , and overtime wages should be included in the computations when regularly paid at the time of the accident.
Carrington v. Consolidated Underwriters 80 So. 2d 427 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
261 , , , .” This rule was followed by the Orleans Court of Appeal in Scott v. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills, La.App., .
Caddo Contracting Co. v. Johnson 64 So. 2d 177 La. 1953