Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 937 So. 2d 5.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Zackery Shane Deville A/K/A Zackery Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
State v. Thomas 272 So. 3d 999 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
State v. Hall 172 So. 3d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
2 Cir. 8/9/06), ] supra; (La.App.
State of Louisiana v. Brendall Louis Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
2 Cir. 8/9/06), rehearing denied, appeal after remand, (La.App.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTERREL J. BOUTTE AKA O'TERREL BOUTTE AKA O'TERRELL BOUTTE La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 8/9/06), as support for his position that the evidence is insufficient to support his adjudication.
State v. Boutte 58 So. 3d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2 Cir. 8/9/06), , as support for his position that the evidence is insufficient to support his adjudication.
State v. Wallace 26 So. 3d 176 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
State v. Capers 998 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Timmons 998 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Davis, 41,245 (La.App.2d Cir.8/9/06), .
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Samuel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 8/9/06), where the court held that the cleansing period under the habitual offender statute begins to run from the date that a defendant is actually discharged from state custody and supervision of the DOC.
State v. Samuel 984 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
2 Cir. 8/9/06), , where the court held that the cleansing period under the habitual offender statute begins to run from the date that a defendant is actually discharged from state custody and supervision of the DOC.
State v. Davis 975 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
State v. Davis, 41,245 (La.App.2d Cir.8/9/06), .
State v. Hollingsworth 962 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hollingsworth 962 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Hailey 953 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
App. 2d Cir.08/09/06), ; State v. Mitchell, 39,305 (La.App.