Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chappuis v. Reggie, 62 So. 2d 92.

40 citing documents.

Amanda Jones v. Citizens For A New Louisiana, Michael Lunsford, And Ryan Thames La. 2024
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 79 So. 3d 987 La. 2011
LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221, p. 7 (La.7/8/98), ; , (1952).
McGlothlin v. Christus St. Patrick Hospital 65 So. 3d 1218 La. 2011
LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221, p. 7 (La.7/8/98), ; , (1952); La.
Black v. St. Tammany Parish Hospital 25 So. 3d 711 La. 2009
LeBreton v. Rabito, 97-2221, p. 7 (La.7/8/98), ; , (1952); La.
Ruiz v. Oniate 713 So. 2d 442 La. 1998
1027 , (1966); , (1952).
Murrill v. Edwards 613 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
[7] , (1952), as authority for the proposition that when the legislature provides, by statute, a method of appointment, the appointment is provided for by law and thus excepted from the constitutional appointment provisions.
Reed v. Washington Parish Police Jury 518 So. 2d 1044 La. 1988
1973); , (1952); Pepsodent Co. v. Krauss Co., 200 La.
State v. Green 493 So. 2d 1178 La. 1986
1st Cir.1975), writ denied , (1952); Op.Atty.
Jones v. Thibodeaux 488 So. 2d 945 La. 1986
(1952); Fakier v. Picou, 246 La.
Hilton v. Hilton 451 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
(1952); State in the interest of Wright, (La.App.
City of Baton Rouge v. DeFrances 429 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
City of Baton Rouge v. Cooley 418 So. 2d 1321 La. 1982
ditionally been, and still are (even under the 1974 Louisiana Constitution) legislatively created judgeships; that the Legislature is not barred constitutionally from prescribing a method for the appointment of temporary replacement or ad hoc, city judges; that the Legislature has made provision for ad hoc judges in city courts by legislation dating back to 1898 [3] , , (1952), supports their constitutional argument.
State ex rel. Wright 408 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1027 , (1966) , (1952), the state argues that repeal by implication is disfavored, and since the legislature realized the conflict between these two acts and sought to remedy same by the repeal of Act 708, this court should hold that Act 708 was expressly repealed and Act 692 was allowed to remain as the amendment to La
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 390 So. 2d 497 La. 1980
Mullins v. State 387 So. 2d 1151 La. 1980
(1952); Cosenza v. Aetna Insurance Co., supra; R.S.
Blanchard v. Brown 388 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1952) as follows: "The uniform jurisprudence is to the effect that all statutory provisions are to be given effect whenever possible.
Hryhorchuk v. Smith 379 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Perry v. City of Monroe 360 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
State Ex Rel. Guste v. General Motors Corp. 354 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Cosenza v. Aetna Ins. Co. 341 So. 2d 1304 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
the office of City Judge was held to be a "state office".
South-West Utilities, Inc. v. S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co. 339 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Peyrefitte v. Harvey 312 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
657 , (1955); , (1952); Malone v. Cannon, 215 La.
Hoffpauir v. City of Crowley 241 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
art. 17; , (1952); Hall v. Rosteet, 247 La.
Gayle v. Porter 239 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
Marquette Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Normand 192 So. 2d 552 La. 1966
: “ * * * [W]here two acts relating to the same subject are passed at the same legislative session, there is a strong presumption against implied repeal, and they are to be construed together, if possible, so as to reconcile them, giving effect to each.
Hall v. Rosteet 169 So. 2d 903 La. 1964
[2] , ; Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
Hall v. Rosteet 169 So. 2d 903 La. 1964
Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
Johnson v. Collector of Revenue 165 So. 2d 466 La. 1964
Distinguished State ex rel. Fonseca v. McCulloch 126 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
“This amendment shall become self-operative when ratified as provided herein.” Defendant-appellant’s chief contention is that, since the Traffic Court was not to function until implemented by the City, when such implementation was effected, the Traffic Court became a statutory court; , .
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo 120 So. 2d 262 La. 1960
and authorities therein cited.
Collector of Revenue v. Olvey 117 So. 2d 563 La. 1959
Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
State Ex Rel. Saint v. Toups 95 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
"In the recent case of Chappuis v. Reggie [ ], , on page 95 the Supreme Court reviewed the jurisprudence on statutory construction, and particularly as applicable to statutes passed at or about the same time, or at the same Session of Legislature, and stated: "`The uniform jurisprudence is to the effect that all statutory provisions are to be given
State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
618 , ; , ; State ex rel.
State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
618 , ; , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Le Blanc v. Democratic State Central Committee 86 So. 2d 192 La. 1956
Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
Comegys v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. 80 So. 2d 110 La. 1955
Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
Guillot v. Nunez 72 So. 2d 513 La. 1954
Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
State ex rel. Fudickar v. Hislop 65 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
and Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
State Ex Rel. Fudickar v. Heard 65 So. 2d 112 La. 1953
On the merits, , , and Babineaux v. Lacobie, 222 La.
Babineaux v. Lacobie 62 So. 2d 95 La. 1952
and the views there expressed are controlling here.