Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. St. Julian, 61 So. 2d 464.

18 citing documents.

Metals USA Plates & Shapes Southeast, Inc. C/W O'Neal Steel Louisiana, LLC v. Louisiana Department of Revenue La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Julian, So.2d 464 (1952); Board of Ethics In Re Davies, 10-1339 (La.App.
Metals U.S. Plates & Shapes Se., Inc. v. La. Dep't of Revenue 240 So. 3d 1016 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Julian, , (1952), Board of Ethics In Re Davies , 10-1339 (La.App.
State v. Walker 700 So. 2d 496 La. 1997
State in Interest of AC 643 So. 2d 719 La. 1994
MacOn v. Costa 437 So. 2d 806 La. 1983
Traigle v. Gulf Coast Aluminum Corp. 422 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Julian, , (1952); State, ex rel.
State, in Interest of Sapia 397 So. 2d 469 La. 1981
Blanchard v. Brown 388 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Julian, , (1951), the Court noted: "The principle that a repeal by implication is not favored by law is especially applicable as between two statutes passed at the same session of the Legislature.
State v. Bosworth 373 So. 2d 152 La. 1979
Julian, , (1952), but noted that both acts were passed on the same day, July 10, 1968, and were signed by the governor on the same day, July 20, 1968.
State v. Elias 357 So. 2d 275 La. 1978
Julian, , (1952), we outlined the pertinent rules as follows: `.
State v. Seals 343 So. 2d 717 La. 1977
Julian, , (1952), we outlined the pertinent rules as follows: “.
Dickerson v. Hennen 249 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Julian, , (1952), the Supreme Court reviewed the law governing the effect of two conflicting Acts passed during the same session of the Legislature: “From a reading of all of these rules governing statutory construction, it is apparent that where the acts are in direct conflict the arbitrary rule, that the s
State ex rel. Assistant District Attorneys Ass'n v. Theriot 242 So. 2d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Johnson v. Sewerage District No. 2 of Parish of Caddo 120 So. 2d 262 La. 1960
Gros v. City of Thibodaux 116 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Julian, , ) and so as to avoid a construction under which any provision would be meaningless.
State Ex Rel. Saint v. Toups 95 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Julian, , , the court stated: "`We are not unmindful of the fact that it is our duty to harmonize and reconcile the acts if possible * * *' "Applying the above rules of statutory construction, we hold that Act 326 of 1956 is a special statute dealing with all city courts other than those expressly excepted therei
State v. Knight 80 So. 2d 391 La. 1955
Guillot v. Nunez 72 So. 2d 513 La. 1954
Julian, , , where it was held that, in interpreting legislative intent as to contradictory provisions contained in Acts Nos. 158 and 303 of 1952, LSA-R.S.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by