DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Pisciotto v. Crucia, 71 So. 2d 226.

65 citing documents.

  • Rodriguez v. Rodriguez 245 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
  • Appleby v. Appleby 245 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Bell v. Bell 225 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
  • Coleman v. Coleman 209 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    (1954), wherein we find this appropriate observation: "The jurisprudence is well settled that a judgment for alimony, as to the amount that has become past due, is the property of him in whose favor it has been given, and is protected against alteration or annulment except by the method and for the
  • Granger v. Granger 193 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 222 La.
  • Vinet v. Vinet 184 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Williams v. Williams, 211 La.
  • Unverzagt v. Galjour 182 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
  • Elchinger v. Elchinger 181 So. 2d 297 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
    Allen v. Allen, La.App., .
  • De La Bretonne v. De La Bretonne 164 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    See Dupuis v. Patin, La.App., ; , ; Williams v. Williams, 211 La.
  • Hebert v. Hebert 159 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 222 La.
  • Dupuis v. Patin 155 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    in which the court held as follows: "The jurisprudence is well settled that a judgment for alimony, as to the amount that has become past due, is the property of him in whose favor it has been given, and is protected against alteration or annulment except by the method and for the causes prescribed by l
  • Allen v. Allen 136 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Harris v. Harris 127 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    196 , ; , ; Dejoie v. Dejoie, 224 La.
  • Duncan v. Roane 127 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    950 , ; and Pisciotto v. Crucia, 1954, , .
  • Arabie v. Arabie 89 So. 2d 890 La. 1956
    Moreover,- , , this court held that the right to receive back alimony in a lump sum is not waived by the divorced wife’s failure to make periodic demands on her former husband.