Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Franek, 70 So. 2d 670.
-
Curtis v. Curtis
403 So. 2d 56
La. 1981
(1953); Houghton v. Hall, 177 La.
-
Luchsinger v. Boettner
388 So. 2d 93
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Articles 2402 and 2405; , ; and Prince v. Hopson, 230 La.
-
Succession of Pittman
282 So. 2d 799
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
167 , Succession of Frenek [Franek, ], , Prince v. Hopson [ 230 La.
-
Succession of Milton
278 So. 2d 159
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Articles 2402 and 2405; , ; *163 and Prince v. Hopson, 230 La.
- Liuzza v. Heirs of Nunzio 241 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
-
Succession of Elrod v. Elrod
218 So. 2d 83
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
575 , (1956); , (1953); Houghton v. Hall, 177 La.
-
Succession of Winsey
170 So. 2d 732
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
8 .’ “The foregoing pronouncement was recently approved in the Succession of Franek, 1954, , .
-
Jones v. Jones
153 So. 2d 173
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In support of this position counsel relies upon the specific requirements of proof on behalf of the wife as enunciated in , .
-
Bailey v. Alice C. Plantation & Refinery Inc.
152 So. 2d 336
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
323, 329 , , 565 (1951); , (On rehearing, 1954); Guilbeau v. Guilbeau, 224 La.
-
Monk v. Monk
144 So. 2d 384
La. 1962
177 , ; , (on rehearing); Prince v. Hopson, 230 La.
-
Succession of Blades
127 So. 2d 263
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Butler v. Burks, La.App., ; Joseph v. Travis, La.App., ; , .
-
Graves v. United States Rubber Company
111 So. 2d 752
La. 1959
323 , ; , ; Guilbeau v. Guilbeau, 224 La.
-
Joseph v. Travis
99 So. 2d 548
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
* * * ’ “The foregoing pronouncement was recently approved in the Succession of Franek, 1954, , .
-
Butler v. Burks
99 So. 2d 180
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
The foregoing pronouncement was recently approved in the Succession of Franek, 1954, , .