Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Brown v. Harris, 72 So. 2d 746.

46 citing documents.

Veron v. Veron 657 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(1954); Wilmot v. Wilmot, 223 La.
Anderson v. Anderson 491 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Hegre v. Hegre 483 So. 2d 920 La. 1986
Billiot v. Rivere 378 So. 2d 512 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
Pearce v. Pearce 348 So. 2d 75 La. 1977
Ward v. Ward 339 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
Ward v. Ward 332 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
708 , ; , ; Sarpy v. Sarpy, La.App., ; Hughes v. Hughes, La.App., ; Chandler v. Chandler, La.App., ; Latour v. Guilbeau, La.App., 256 So.
Sarpy v. Sarpy 323 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Bryant v. Bryant 310 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Webster v. Webster 308 So. 2d 302 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1954), an unemployed wife earned $150 per month, received $7,315.01 in the property settlement, and also had $6,600 on deposit in a building and loan association earning $16.50 per month.
Cortes v. Fleming 307 So. 2d 611 La. 1974
(1954); Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Frederic v. Frederic 302 So. 2d 903 La. 1974
Newman v. Newman 293 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
138 , (1951); , (1954); (4th Cir. 1969); (4th Cir. 1967); (3rd Cir. 1963).
Kees v. Kees 292 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
1004 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Ash v. Wittenberg 278 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Our consideration of the jurisprudence which included Smith v. Smith, supra, , (1954); Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Guarisco v. Guarisco 271 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1954); Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
McNeill v. McNeill 270 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
and Jones v. Floyd, La.App., .
Hope v. Hope 271 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
221 , ; , ; Rabun v. Rabun, 232 La.
Fellows v. Fellows 267 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
70 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Caldwell v. Gilbert 253 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
the Supreme Court also said: "* * * If in the future she does not have sufficient means for her maintenance, she may at that time apply to the court for alimony, * * *.
Jones v. Jones 248 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
5 , (1934); , (1954); Holman v. Holman, 219 La.
Worley v. Worley 247 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
70 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Doughty v. Doughty 244 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
1004 , 95 So.2d *88 635 (1957); , (1954).
Garrett v. Garrett 229 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
* * * ’ See also, , ; Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Leavines v. Leavines 224 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
alimony was refused to a wife who had approximately $14,000.00 in assets that yielded an income of $16.50 per month.
McNeill v. McNeill 223 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
(1954); Comstock v. Bourge, 210 La.
Brenan v. Montz 221 So. 2d 40 La. 1969
* * * ” See also, , ; Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Morace v. Morace 220 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
1004 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
McMath v. Masters 198 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Burris v. Burris 197 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1954), the Supreme Court said: “ * * * The alimony provided for in Article 160.
Oster v. Rittiner 181 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
869 , ; Fruehan v. Fruehan, La.App., ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Viser v. Viser 179 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
(1954), the court declared: "* * * [I]t is well settled that a judgment awarding or refusing alimony is subject to change, adjustment, or modification at any time when changes in the circumstances of the parties may justify it."
Guilbeau v. Latour 168 So. 2d 422 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Anderson v. Anderson 158 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
1004 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Fruehan v. Fruehan 153 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
221 , ; Brown v. Harris [ , ]; and Rabun v. Rabun [ 232 La.
Misko v. Capuder 147 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
221 , ; , ; Harris v. Harris, La.App.
Hicks v. Hicks 147 So. 2d 750 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
1004 , ; , ; Wilmot v. Wilmot, 223 La.
Loe v. Loe 131 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
70 , ; and Brown v. Harris, 1954, , .
Rader v. Pegram 126 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
221 , ; , ; Rabun v. Rabun, 232 La.
Vicknair v. Vicknair 112 So. 2d 702 La. 1959
St. Martin v. Lewis 109 So. 2d 81 La. 1959
646 , ; , and Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
646 , , , and Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
646 , , , and Stabler v. Stabler, 226 La.
Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957
Jones v. Jones 93 So. 2d 917 La. 1957