41133
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.
Albritton v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 70 So. 2d 111 (La. 1953).
Cited by
- Grimaldi Mechanical v. the Gray Ins. Co. 933 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
- Kevin James Mouton v. Allison Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Mouton v. Thomas 924 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
- Wallace v. First Assur. Life of America 862 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
- Wickramasekra v. ASSOC. INTERN. INS. CO. 890 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
- Ott v. LPK Systems, Inc. 812 So. 2d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
- LeBlanc v. Babin 786 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
- Talley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 760 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
- Husband v. Darby 749 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
- Haas v. Audubon Indem. Co. 722 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
- Sawyer v. Shelter Insurance Companies 702 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
- Citgo Petroleum Corp. v. Yeargin, Inc. 690 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Opinion text
HAMITER, Justice (dissenting). I agree with the conclusion of the Court of Appeal, together with the well considered reasons assigned therefor, that the impact between the truck and road bed, *536 which occurred because of a mechanical failure respecting the machine, did not constitute a collision within the meaning of the policy. Hence, I think that the judgment of that court should be affirmed. I respectfully dissent.