DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of New Orleans v. Levy, 64 So. 2d 798.

15 citing documents.

  • Joseph R. McMahon v. City of New Orleans La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
  • City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum 739 So. 2d 748 La. 1999
    (1953) (emphasis added).
  • City of New Orleans v. Board of Directors of Louisiana State Museum 709 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Ross 654 So. 2d 1311 La. 1995
    (1953); State v. Bonner, 193 La.
  • Grider v. Adm'r, Dept. of Employment SEC. 564 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    See Pierre v. Adm'r , supra; , (1953).
  • Pierre v. Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security 553 So. 2d 442 La. 1989
    (1953), an “unconstitutional amending statute or ordinance is in reality no law, and in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.” See also State in the Interest of Hunter
  • Pierre v. ADM'R, LA. OFFICE OF EMP. SEC. 553 So. 2d 442 La. 1989
    (1953), an "unconstitutional amending statute or ordinance is in reality no law, and in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed."
  • Maher v. City of New Orleans 235 So. 2d 402 La. 1970
    852 , , in which we maintained the validity of the ordinance had set at rest the question of whether or not the ordinance was subject to attack because it was too vague and indefinite.
  • Maher v. City of New Orleans 222 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    We find the answer to this objection, partially in the constitutional provision itself which, as we have previously determined permits the members of the City Council the authority to so act in these cases, and in the Supreme Court decisions of City of New Orleans v. Pergament, supra, , (1953), which have decided that there is nothing vague and indefinite in the wording of the Ordinance when it uses the words "architectural and historical" and "quaint and distinctive" in reference to the qualiti
  • Vieux Carre Property Owners & Associates, Inc. v. City of New Orleans 167 So. 2d 367 La. 1964
  • City of New Orleans v. Levy 98 So. 2d 210 La. 1957
  • State v. Clayton 99 So. 2d 312 La. 1957
    The unconstitutional amending statute or ordinance is in reality no law, and in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.” , , and the many authorities there cited.
  • City of Shreveport v. Brock 89 So. 2d 156 La. 1956
    852 , , , , where we sustained ordinances of the City of New Orleans creating the Vieux Carre Commission for the preservation of the architecture and atmosphere of the famed French Quarter of that city, and regulating in that section the display of signs and billboards.
  • Archer v. City of Shreveport 85 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    an `* * * unconstitutional amending statute or ordinance is in reality no law, and in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.
  • Archer v. City of Shreveport 77 So. 2d 517 La. 1955
    an “ * * * unconstitutional amending statute or ordinance is in reality no law, and in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it had never been passed.