Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 64 So. 2d 417.

43 citing documents.

Segura v. Frank 630 So. 2d 714 La. 1994
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 596 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1953); Stallings v. Stallings, 177 La.
Matter of Am. Waste & Pollution Control 597 So. 2d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Dance v. Dance 552 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
Babin v. Saturn Engineering Corp. 501 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Werner v. Department of Police 487 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, , (1953).
Graham v. Sequoya Corp. 478 So. 2d 1223 La. 1985
Ayo v. Control Insulation Corp. 477 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Cahn v. Cahn 468 So. 2d 1176 La. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., , (1953).
Tullier v. Tullier 464 So. 2d 278 La. 1985
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, , (1953).
Powell v. Ferguson 429 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Procell v. Insurance Co. of North America 425 So. 2d 860 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
1979); Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., , (1953).
Dominguez v. Travelers & Allstate Insurance 415 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Rodriguez v. Brown & Root, Inc. 410 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
222 , ; , ; Rossville Commercial Alcohol Corp. v. Dennis Sheen Transfer Co., Inc., Orl., 18 La.App.
Southern-Gulf Marine Co. No. 9. Inc. v. Camcraft, Inc. 410 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
1444 (1881), , -419 (1953).
Mason v. Mason 399 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
Tilley v. Government Employees Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Johnson v. Fournet 387 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Co., General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. [Anzelmo], , (1953).
Stipe v. Joseph A. Neyrey General Contractors, Inc. 385 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1953); Stallings v. Stallings, 177 La.
Bordelon v. Bordelon 381 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Ardoin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., , (1953).
TPMPT Emp. Credit Union v. Charpentier 376 So. 2d 592 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
However, , the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the well settled rule that remedial statutes and statutes governing procedure are to be given retroactive effect, in the absence of language showing a contrary intention.
Lott v. Haley 370 So. 2d 521 La. 1979
Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 360 So. 2d 1331 La. 1978
(1953); Stallings v. Stallings, 177 La.
Peyrefitte v. Harvey 312 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Reed v. Meaux 292 So. 2d 557 La. 1974
art. 2642, Comments; , (1953).
White v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEACHERS'RETIRE. SYS. 276 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Anzelmo, 1953, , .
Hammond Asphalt Company, Inc. v. Joiner 270 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
(1953) the court held: "It is the settled law that remedial statutes and statutes governing procedure will be given retroactive effect in the absence of language showing a contrary intention."
American Finance Corp. of Coushatta, Inc. v. Small 250 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
Brown v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, supra; , (1953); State v. Standard Oil Company of Louisiana, 188 La.
Orleans Parish School Board v. Pittman Construction Co. 244 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1953); State v. Alden Mills, 202 La.
American Budget Plan, Inc. v. Small 229 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
League Central Credit Union v. Montgomery 198 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Succession of Harz 181 So. 2d 272 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
(1953); Oil Well Supply Co. v. Red Iron Drilling Co., 210 La.
Pelloat v. Greater New Orleans Expressway Commission 175 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
General Motors Acceptance Corporation vs. Anzelmo, , .
State v. Cleveland 166 So. 2d 267 La. 1964
See, Miller v. City of Shreveport, La.App., ; Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company, La.App., ; , ; Geddes & Moss U. & E. Co. v. First National Life Ins.
Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company 136 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
2d 726 ; , ; Rossville Commercial Alcohol Corp. v. Dennis Sheen Transfer Co., Inc., Orl., 18 La.App.
Finn v. Uddo 135 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
the Supreme Court refused to enjoin executory process, and, after referring to the note and to the mortgage, said that executory process was proper because in “the latter instrument,” which was the act of mortgage, it was stated that: “The mortgagor does hereby confess judgment in favor of the vendor
Doherty v. Randazzo 128 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
NOTES [1] , and reaffirmed in Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones, 226 La.
Davis v. United Fruit Company 120 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
(First citation added) See also Miller v. City of Shreveport, La.App.1956, ; General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Anzelmo, 1953, , ; Brown v. Indemnity Ins.
Mack Motor Truck Corp. v. Coco 106 So. 2d 518 La. 1958
Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
222 , ; , ; Washington Nat.
Miller v. City of Shreveport 90 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Anzelmo, 1953, , .
Automotive Finance Co. v. Daigle 80 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Furthermore, the Act is procedural in form, and procedural statutes may be given retrospective effect, , .
Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones 76 So. 2d 305 La. 1954