Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., 73 So. 2d 781.
-
Andrepont v. Ochsner
84 So. 2d 63
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Paul, Minn., supra, was reviewed by the Supreme Court and on rehearing, , , the Court said: "The rule makes it incumbent on the physician, surgeon or dentist who becomes defendant in a malpractice case to show that he is possessed of the required skill and competence indicated and that in applying that skill to the given case he used reasonable care and diligence al
-
Fairley v. Douglas
76 So. 2d 576
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co., , , as follows: "A physician, surgeon or dentist, according to the jurisprudence of this court and of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, is not required to exercise the highest degree of skill and care possible.
- Thomas v. Lobrano 76 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954