DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bascle v. Perez, 71 So. 2d 551.

20 citing documents.

  • Morphy, Makofsky & Masson, Inc. v. CANAL PLACE 2000 538 So. 2d 569 La. 1989
    [10] , (1954); Doll v. Albert Weiblen Marble & Granite Co., Inc., 207 La.
  • Porter v. Johnson 408 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    [3] , (1954); Doll v. Albert Weiblen Marble & Granite Co., Inc., 207 La.
  • Schaff v. Landers 355 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    197 ; Bascle v. Perez, 1954, , ; C.C.1903; Comment, 1976, 50 Tulane L.Rev.
  • Brouillette v. National Remodelers & Rebuilders, Inc. 321 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    In so far as the quantum meruit claim is concerned, , (1954), which holds as follows : “ ‘ * * * the jurisprudence of the courts of this state [is] to the effect that where one employs the services of another without specifying what compensation will be paid therefor, or where one avails himself of the services of another in the performance of a task, he i
  • Gremillion v. Rinaudo 240 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    1082 , ; , ; Jeanfrau v. Plaquemines Parish Democratic Executive Committee, 204 La.
  • Guilbeau v. Jeanerette Lumber & Shingle Co. 214 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    Appellees cite in support of their conclusion Bá , (1954).
  • Swan v. Beaubouef 206 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    769 , , is applicable to this case.
  • Bordelon Motors, Inc. v. Thompson 176 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Wischer v. Madison Realty Company 136 So. 2d 62 La. 1961
    and Southern Premium Service v. Oddo, 226 La.
  • Wischer v. Madison Realty Co. 128 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    the Supreme Court considered a motion to dismiss an appeal which had been taken to the Court of Appeal but which should have been taken to the Supreme Court.
  • Leon v. St. Bernard Parish Democratic Committee 117 So. 2d 447 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
    58 , , .” The requirement that there must be citation of appeal where the order of appeal is not signed in open court is applicable in such a contest as this as in all other actions.
  • Union Producing Co. v. Martin 110 So. 2d 99 La. 1959
  • Morgan v. Dixie Electric Membership Corp. 103 So. 2d 88 La. 1958
    * * * ” , and Johnson v. Nora, 228 La.
  • Warren v. De Armas 100 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    58 , .” While it is true that appeals are favored and should not be dismissed on mere technicalities, the failure to issue and to properly serve citation of appeal is jurisdictional and is not a mere technicality.
  • Littlejohn v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 97 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1957
    In support of their motion to dismiss, , , wherein the Supreme Court held that an appeal was subject to dismissal as to a defendant who was not cited even though the motion for the appeal was made and the order granting the appeal was signed in open court.
  • Hartford Fire Insurance v. Staggs 95 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    857 , ; , ; Resweber v. Jacob, 229 La.
  • Gaines v. B. Bennett Co. 92 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    58 , .” We agree with appellant’s counsel that the court shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence or procedure, LSA-R.S.
  • Barbari v. Firemen's Insurance 92 So. 2d 580 La. 1957
    Jackson v. Perkins, 221 La.
  • Resweber v. Jacob 86 So. 2d 64 La. 1956
  • Johnson v. Nora 83 So. 2d 643 La. 1955
    Hernandez v. Ethyl Corp., 224 La.