DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE Ex Rel. MARSTON v. MARSTON, 67 So. 2d 587.

18 citing documents.

  • Newman v. Newman 691 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Champion v. Champion 618 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    App. 2nd Cir.1986); , (1953).
  • Vosbein v. Vosbein 506 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
  • Babin v. Babin 420 So. 2d 1135 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
  • Guedry Finance Co. v. Sanderson 348 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
  • Lynn v. Lynn 316 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1953); Wheeler v. Wheeler, 184 La.
  • Hollier v. Hollier 258 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1953), involved a plea of lis pendens alleging a prior suit predicated upon simi *185 lar grounds.
  • Caldwell v. Gilbert 253 So. 2d 639 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    and cases cited therein.
  • Lucas v. Lucas 195 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
    (1953), is applicable to the facts at bar and requires that the present suit be brought in the Parish of Caddo.
  • Lucas v. Lucas 197 So. 2d 81 La. 1967
    and the authorities therein cited.
  • Knight v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners 195 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
  • Landry v. Landry 192 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    the Supreme Court said: "It is well settled that the pleas of res judicata and lis pendens bear a strong analogy and that a fair test of lis pendens is to inquire whether a final judgment in the former suit would be res judicata in the latter, if it would then the exception of lis pendens is well plea
  • Smith v. Smith 179 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Scott v. Ware 160 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    "It is well settled that the pleas of res judicata and lis pendens bear a strong analogy and that a fair test of lis pendens is to inquire whether a final judgment in the former suit would be res judicata in the latter, if it would then the exception of lis pendens is well pleaded."
  • Miguez v. Miguez 128 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    the court held as follows: “It is well settled that the pleas of res judicata and lis pendens bear a strong analogy and that a fair test of lis pendens is to inquire whether a final judgment in the former suit would be res judicata in the latter, if it would then the exception of lis pendens is w
  • De Lee v. Price 94 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    which states that a “fair test” of whether the exception of lis pen-dens is well pleaded “is to inquire whether a final judgment in the former suit would be res judicata in the latter,” Id., 67 So.2d at page 589 .
  • D'Asaro v. Sawyer 87 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Marston v. Marston, 1953, , , the organ of the Supreme Court in discussing a similar problem said: “It is well settled that the pleas of res judicata and lis pendens bear a strong analogy and that a fair test of lis pendens is to inquire whether a final judgment in the former suit would be res judicata in the latter, if it wo
  • Roumain v. Moody 72 So. 2d 473 La. 1954
    has stayed the proceedings in his court while the application for writs was pending here.