Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Eaton v. Eaton, 81 So. 2d 371.

17 citing documents.

Glaze v. Glaze 389 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Everett v. Everett 345 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1955) is dispositive of this point.
Tjaden v. Tjaden 294 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1955) certiorari denied 350 U.S. 873 , 76 S.Ct.
Hudman v. Hudman 259 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1972
417 , (1946) , (1955) inasmuch as plaintiff, in her depo *621 sition taken on the motion for summary judgment, admitted that she was never a resident of Mississippi but had gone there for a few days only to testify in the divorce proceedings.
Didier v. Didier 230 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1955) and cases cited therein.
Criticized Gay v. Gay 203 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Law Review 254; , (1955) quotes from the Rouse case, but distinguishes it on the facts; Turpin v. Turpin, La.App., (2d Cir. 1966, writ of certiorari refused) follows Rouse; Clark v. Clark, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1966) distinguishes Rouse on the facts.
Distinguished Clark v. Clark 192 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
1065 , (1951), , (1955).
Boudreaux v. Welch 192 So. 2d 356 La. 1966
417 , (1946) , (1955) inasmuch as plaintiff, in her deposition taken on the motion for summary judgment, admitted that she was never a resident of Mississippi but had gone there for a few days only to testify in the divorce proceedings.
Boudreaux v. Welch 180 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
We find in the case of Eaton v. Eaton (1955) , , a case ■strikingly similar to the instant case, in fact, so much so that we hold that it is controlling of the question before us for decision.
Gilbert v. Cowan 180 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Cities Service Oil Co. v. Carter 175 So. 2d 288 La. 1965
of 1921 art. 1, § 6; , (1955); Tremont Lumber Co. v. Police Jury of Winn Parish, 164 La.
Levert v. Levert 156 So. 2d 284 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
Or she may be able to show that their authorization was limited to waiving service of process upon her, in which case she would clearly retain the right to question the husband’s domicile and the Nevada court’s jurisdiction; , (1955), cert.
Campbell v. Thomas 140 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Breaux v. Laird, 230 La.
State ex rel. Langridge v. Harris 138 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1962
39 ; , ; Louisiana Oil Refining Corporation v. Williams, 170 La.
Levy v. Bonfouca Hunting Club 136 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
868 , ; , ; Hayward v. Carolina Ins.
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
868 , ; , ; Hayward v. Carolina Ins.
Farthing v. Neely 129 So. 2d 224 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
221 , ; , ; In re Clover Ridge Planting & Mfg.