Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite United Carbon Company v. Mississippi River Fuel Corp., 89 So. 2d 209.

20 citing documents.

Grabert v. Iberia Parish School Board 625 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
4th cir.1972), , (1956) (La.App.
St. Charles Parish School Bd. v. GAF Corp. 512 So. 2d 1165 La. 1987
Thibodeaux v. Bordelon 488 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
prescriptive statutes are strictly construed, and the facts of the case must bring the action clearly within the specific provision of the law sought to be applied.” , (1956) We find that the provisions of LSA-R.S.
Continental Insurance Co. v. Fairfield Temporaries, Inc. 437 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Elliot Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 424 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
As a final observation, the Simoni court noted ambiguous prescription statutes must be strictly construed against prescription and in favor of the obligation sought to be extinguished by it, , (1956).
Robertson v. Jimmy Walker Chrysler-Plymouth 368 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Duer & Taylor v. BLANCHARD, WALKER, ETC. 354 So. 2d 192 La. 1978
132 , (1959); , (1956); Sims v. New Orleans Ry.
Westenberger v. State, Department of Education 333 So. 2d 264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
State Ex Rel. Guste v. Simoni, Heck & Associates 331 So. 2d 478 La. 1976
Small v. Caterpillar Mfg. Corp. 319 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1956); Mansur v. Abraham, 183 La.
Gulf Oil Corporation v. State Mineral Board 317 So. 2d 576 La. 1975
813 , (1957); , (1956); (La.App., Orl.Cir.
Ford Marketing Corp. v. First Auto Parts 308 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
559 , (1956); Remington Rand v. Lester Boliew, d/b/a Blue’s Red Devil Cocktail Lounge, (La.App.
Bradford v. City of Shreveport 294 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(Orl.La.App., 1934) ; , (1956)
Cyr v. Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corporation 273 So. 2d 694 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Foster v. Breaux 270 So. 2d 526 La. 1972
(1956); Mansur v. Abraham, 183 La.
State Ex Rel. Murray v. BOARD OF TR. OF POLICE PEN. FUND 259 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Credit Service Corp. v. Allen 223 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Finally, , (1956) as containing language strongly persuasive of the view that “all other accounts” in Article 3538 mean only accounts such as merchants’ accounts.
Feltus v. Feltus 210 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
Merrimack Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Radalec, Inc. 126 So. 2d 848 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
244 , ; , ; Importsales, Inc. v. Lindeman, 231 La.
Hebert v. Spano 98 So. 2d 199 La. 1957
Very recently, , , we stated: “ * * * It is equally well settled that prescriptive statutes are strictly construed, and the facts of the case must bring the action clearly within the specific provisions of the law sought to be applied.