Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Bel, 69 So. 2d 40.
-
ExxonMobil Pipeline Co. v. Union Pacific Railroad
35 So. 3d 192
La. 2010
(1953), for example, the plaintiff established that its railroad would serve the public | ¶(¡generally and any industries located near its tracks, and that it hoped to move and transport over its line various commodities, including timber, gravel, and cattle.
-
Steve H. Crooks and Era Lea Crooks v. Placid Refining Company
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
So.2d 40 (1953); (La.App.
- Crooks v. Placid Refining Co. 903 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
- Louisiana Resources Co. v. Greene 406 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Marshall v. Caddo Parish Police Jury
252 So. 2d 914
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
and the provisions of La.C.C.
- Dixie Pipeline Company v. Barry 227 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
- Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. City of Houma 229 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
-
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Pierce
192 So. 2d 561
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Nezat, La.App.
- Texas Pipe Line Company v. Stein 190 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
- Louisiana Power and Light Co. v. Charpentier 165 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Blanchard
149 So. 2d 615
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
said: "Under Article 1, Section 2, of our Constitution, no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property except by due process of law, and except as otherwise provided in the Constitution private property shall not be taken or damaged except for public purpose and after just and adequate compe
- Central Louisiana Electric Co. v. Pugh 96 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
- Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Kinder Canal Co. 69 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
-
Calcasieu & S. Ry. Co. v. Bel
69 So. 2d 541
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
It is also a companion suit to that of Calcasieu & Southern Railway Co. v. Bel, et als, La.Sup., , in which the Supreme Court of this state has .