Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Northwestern Mutual Fire Association v. Allain, 77 So. 2d 395.

31 citing documents.

  • Elkins v. Key 702 So. 2d 57 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    585 , (1959); , (1954); Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, 223 La.
  • Shahine v. State Univ. Med. Center 680 So. 2d 1352 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    585 , (1959); , (1954); Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, 223 La.
  • Novak v. Texada, Miller, Masterson and Davis Clinic 514 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, Inc., , (1954); Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, 223 La.
  • Morgan v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 456 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, Inc., , (1954); Dorman v. T. Smith & Son, 223 La.
  • Davis v. Aetna Insurance Company 291 So. 2d 486 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1954) and Jones v. Shell Petroleum Corporation, 185 La.
  • Haymark and Sons, Inc. v. Prendergast 268 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
  • Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Brown 256 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1954), wherein the court listed the conditions neces *718 sary for the application of the doctrine.
  • O'Reilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 230 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 (1954); Brechtel v. Gulf States Elevator Corporation, 195 So.
  • Hanchey v. Central Louisiana Electric Co. 218 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 (1954); (La.App.
  • Evans v. Travelers Insurance Company 212 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Valentine v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 205 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    he accident which damaged plaintiff was caused by an agency or instrumentality within the actual or constructive control of the defendant, if the accident is of a kind which ordinarily does not occur in the absence of negligence, and the evidence as to the true explanation of the accident is more readily accessable to the defendant than to the plaintiff.” Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass’n v. Allain, , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 .
  • West v. Hydro-Test, Inc. 196 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 ; Prosser on Torts, Sec.
  • Eversmeyer v. Chrysler Corporation 192 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    ( , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 ; Langlinais v. Geophysical Service Inc., 237 La.
  • Geismar v. General Gas Corp. 182 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    810 , ; , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 , and authorities there cited.
  • Hebert v. Valenti 179 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    (1955); Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, Inc., 237 La.
  • Watson v. Mid-Continent Aerial Sprayers, Inc. 170 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    Several cases are cited as authority for the above statement, , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 (1955).
  • Fireman's Mutual Insurance v. S. S. Jacobs Co. 162 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 , and authorities there cited.
  • National Surety Corp. v. Travelers Insurance Co. 149 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    585 , our Supreme Court has described this doctrine as follows: “ , 77 So.
  • Johnson v. Johness 145 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 (1955), quoted in Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, 237 La.
  • Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. Gillette Oil Co. 139 So. 2d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Hawayek v. Simmons, La.App., , 61 A.L.R.2d 1254 ; , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 ; Beck v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., .
  • Jefferson Davis Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Mike Hooks, Inc. 134 So. 2d 326 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    585 , the court set forth the law of res ipsa loquitur as follows : “ , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 , “ * * * res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence, the applicability of which is to be determined in each case at the conclusion of the trial.
  • Maryland Casualty Company v. Rittiner 133 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    49 A.L.R.2d 362 , a fire damage case similar to the instant case, our Supreme Court held: "Cases involving injuries inflicted on the plaintiff by steam, electricity, fire, gas, complicated industrial machinery, and other dangerous instrumentalities furnish the clearest instances of the use of the
  • Kemra Lumber Co. v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 132 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Carter v. Middleton, La.App., ; Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass’n v. Allain, , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 .
  • Day v. National US Radiator Corporation 128 So. 2d 660 La. 1961
    810 , ; , , 49 A.L.R.2d 362 , and authorities *665 there cited.
  • Langlinais v. Geophysical Service, Inc. 111 So. 2d 781 La. 1959
  • Williams v. US Royal Tires 101 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    "When the inference of negligence on the part of the defendant arises by reason of application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to a case, `the burden is then on the defendant to show absence of negligence on his part,' , , at *491 pages 396-397, 49 A.L.R.2d 362 , or `to exculpate himself from negligence,' Saunders v. Jimmie Walker Home Appliances, 229 La.
  • Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 95 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    When the inference of negligence-on the part of the defendant arises by reason of application of the doctrine of res-ipsa loquitur to a case, “the burden is then on the defendant to show absence of negligence on his- part.” , at pages 396-397, or “to exculpate himself from negligence,” Saunders v. Walker, 229 La.
  • Castille v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance 92 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Fire Ass’n v. Allain, , 77 So.
  • Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 91 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    When the inference of negligence on the part of the defendant arises by reason of application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur to a case, “the burden is then on the defendant to show absence of negligence on his part,” , , at pages 396-397, or “to exculpate himself from negligence,” Saunders v. Walker, 229 La.
  • Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHinery 90 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    at page 397 and cases cited therein.
  • Marchese v. New Orleans Police Department 77 So. 2d 742 La. 1955
    We are without authority to examine into the question of the sufficiency thereof.” [ .]