Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite STATE, DEPT. OF HWYS. v. Barineau, 72 So. 2d 869.

23 citing documents.

Louisiana Intrastate Gas Corp. v. McIntire 349 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
(1954); Collins Pipeline Company v. New Orleans East, Inc., (La.App.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Henderson Properties, Inc. 264 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Rivers 242 So. 2d 916 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
792 , ; State, , ; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Terminal Co., 200 La.
Sterkx v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 of Rapides Par. 214 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
792 , ; State, , ; Westwego Canal & Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Terminal Co. v. Louisiana Terminal Commission, 200 La.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Salemi 193 So. 2d 252 La. 1966
719 , , , , as items of costs, and that in both cases the judgments were for costs.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Reimers 192 So. 2d 558 La. 1966
State, Department of Highways v. Babineaux 189 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
Westwego Canal & T. Co. v. Louisiana Highway Comm., 200 La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Reimers 182 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Further, I find nothing in the cases of State Through Dept. of Highways v. Barineau (1954) , , Orleans Parish School Board v. Brown (1964) 245 La.
Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal Dist. v. Prestridge 182 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Salemi 185 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
While the opinion rendered in State, , , left some doubt whether the fees of appraisers called as experts by a landowner in an expropriation proceeding brought against him were properly assessed as an element of damages or costs, all uncertainty with respect to the question has now been resolved.
Dow v. Department of Highways 179 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
19:12; State, , ; State, Through Department of Highways v. Rownd, La.App.
Orleans Parish School Board v. Dorsett 161 So. 2d 274 La. 1964
19:12; , and Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Polmer, 231 La.
Poirier v. T. L. James & Co. 163 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
State Through Dept. of Highways v. Hart, La.App., ; Bernard v. State, supra.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Jones 146 So. 2d 414 La. 1962
In a two-to-one decision with Judge Landry dissenting, , , in which this court was quoting from the Westwego case, supra.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Moorman 141 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
See also State, through Department *78 , .
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Hart 137 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jones 138 So. 2d 466 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
In State, , 72 So.2d *471 869 , the Supreme Court commented as follows: “To hold that the owner must pay his own costs in resisting attempts to take his land without his consent would nullify to a certain extent the constitutional guarantee of just and adequate compensation, Art. 1, Sec.
Bernard v. State 127 So. 2d 774 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
19:12; State, , ; State, Through Department of Highways v. Rownd, La.App.
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McDuffie 123 So. 2d 93 La. 1960
State v. Barineau, 1954, , ; Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Polmer, 1956, 231 La.
State v. Rownd 119 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1960
See Housing Authority of New Orleans v. Polmer, supra; State, , 72 So.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Guidry 109 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
the Supreme Court of Louisiana stated: “Although the lower court rendered the proper judgment, the statement contained in the Court’s ‘Reasons’ is incorrect, since the general rule that the State and its political subdivision, public boards or commissions are exempt from payment of court costs ex
Housing Authority v. Polmer 91 So. 2d 600 La. 1956
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. La Bauve 75 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by