Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stabler v. Stabler, 75 So. 2d 12.

24 citing documents.

Higdon v. Higdon 385 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1032 , (1959); , (1954)."
Loyacano v. Loyacano 358 So. 2d 304 La. 1978
1032 , (1959); , (1954)."
Ward v. Ward 339 So. 2d 839 La. 1976
1032 , (1959); , (1954).
Ward v. Ward 332 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
1032 , ; , ; ; Doughty v. Doughty, La.App., 244 So.
Sarpy v. Sarpy 323 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
1004 , (1957); , (1954).
Phillpott v. Phillpott 321 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Nicolle v. Nicolle 308 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Bryant v. Bryant 310 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
1004 , (1957); , (1954).
Frederic v. Frederic 302 So. 2d 903 La. 1974
1004 , (1957); , (1954).
Ash v. Wittenberg 278 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
320 , (1954); , (1954); Rabun v. Rabun, 232 La.
Fellows v. Fellows 267 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
1004 , (1957); , ; Brown v. Harris, 225 La.
Kellogg v. Faust 254 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
869 , (1944); , (1954); Fortier v. Gelpi, 195 La.
Followed Johnson v. McAfee 249 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1954); Matheny v. Matheny, supra; Fortier v. Gelpi, 195 La.
Worley v. Worley 247 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
1004 , (1957); , ; Brown v. Harris, 225 La.
Garrett v. Garrett 229 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
320 , ; , ; Rabun v. Rabun, 232 La.
Brenan v. Montz 221 So. 2d 40 La. 1969
320 , ; , ; Rabun v. Rabun, 232 La.
Vedrenne v. Vedrenne 163 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
the wife with $20,000.00 and a bankrupt husband was held not entitled to alimony.
Roberts v. Roberts 145 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
The leading cases with respect to the necessitous circumstances of a wife who has assets or income, are: Loe v. Loe, La.App., ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
Loe v. Loe 131 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
751 , ; Stabler v. Stabler, 1954, , ; and Brown v. Harris, 1954, 225 La.
Simon v. Simon 127 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
13 in which the evidence showed that the wife had acquired from her mother through simulated sales without consideration, certain real estate valued at $20,000 but the understanding between the parties was that the transfer of these properties was not to become effective until the death of the aged mot
St. Martin v. Lewis 109 So. 2d 81 La. 1959
320 , , .” And in the Rabun case we quoted with approval the following language contained in Brown v. Harris, supra: “In defending her judgment for alimony, the wife relies on Article 160 of the Civil Code, which allows a divorced wife alimony when she ‘has not sufficient means for her maintenance’.
Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
Rabun v. Rabun 95 So. 2d 635 La. 1957
Howell v. Howell 85 So. 2d 885 La. 1956