Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Accardo v. Dimiceli, 76 So. 2d 521.
-
Windward Land, LLC and Michael Morris Gulley versus Mary Lee Mann and William Lamont Frazier, Alvin Edwards and …
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
art. 2002, provided the exclusive grounds for annulling a judgment for vices of form); So.
-
Boulmay v. Heebe
238 So. 3d 459
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
(e)(citing Accardo v. Dimiceli , , (1954) ).
-
Cossé v. Orihuela
109 So. 3d 950
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Official Revision Comment (e); , (1954).
-
National Income Realty Trust v. Paddie
737 So. 2d 1270
La. 1999
4th Cir.1984) ( , (1954)).
- Hollander v. Wandell 703 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
Sweeney, Inc. v. Olivier
589 So. 2d 61
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
art. 2002, Comment (e); , (1954).
- Zuviceh v. Rodriguez 444 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
-
Credithrift of America, Inc. v. Williams
426 So. 2d 339
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Credithrift argues that a faulty appraisal does not render the enforcement of a , (1954).
- Sicard v. Sicard 426 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
-
Kees v. Michael
376 So. 2d 1282
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
(1954), a suit to set aside a partition judgment and judicial sale held pursuant to the judgment, the court held that the failure of the auctioneer to notify plaintiff's counsel of the time and place of sale did not constitute an improper practice or make the judgment and sale so unconscionable as to wa
- Johnston v. Smith 284 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
- Warner v. Garrett 268 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
-
Milner v. Milner
244 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
( , (1954) interpreting C.P.
-
Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. Guercio
200 So. 2d 717
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Article 2002, Comment (e); , ), * * *" *723 We can only view the Gumina decision, supra, as holding in effect that service of the notice of demand called for in Article 2639, supra, is not "process" within the meaning of the term as used in Article 2002, supra.
-
Willoz v. Veteranz Acceptance & Thrift, Inc.
188 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Gumina v. Dupas, La.App., , and it is obvious that plaintiff’s petition sets forth none of those grounds.
-
Plauche-Locke Securities, Inc. v. Johnson
187 So. 2d 178
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
plaintiff sought to annul a partition judgment, one of the grounds being that the appraisers did not take the oath required by law.
-
Gumina v. Dupas
178 So. 2d 291
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Art. 2002, Comment (e); , ), and the record is devoid of any allegation or proof that the judgment sought to be annulled was obtained by fraud or ill practices.
- Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
-
WWOM, Inc. v. Grapes
158 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Comment (e) to LSA-C.C.P.
- Hall v. Hall 127 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961