Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Olivier v. Abunza, 76 So. 2d 528.

29 citing documents.

Vidrine v. Vidrine 497 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Short v. Fink 372 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
34 , ; , ; Chapman v. Chapman, La.App., .
Johnson v. Romaguera 349 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
. , ; Orlando v. Polito, 228 La.
Johnson v. Johnson 296 So. 2d 470 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Bynum v. Bynum 296 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
(1954); Fister v. Fister, supra."
Cowart v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. 273 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Since credibility of the witnesses is essential to this determination ( , [1954]), we find no manifest error in this decision.
Davis v. Davis 258 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Adler v. Adler 239 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
34 , ; , ; Chapman v. Chapman, La.App., .
Karl v. Karl 191 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
(1954); Fister v. Fister, supra.
LaFiette v. Travelers Insurance Co. 191 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
530 (1954); Spears v. Biles (La.App.)
Phillips v. Insurance Co. of North America 181 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
962 , (1955); , (1954); Eals v. Swan, 221 La.
Schwander v. Foster 165 So. 2d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Harless v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 164 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Cannon v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company 146 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
530: "This Court has a rule, which is but a splendid affirmation in determining evidence taken by another court, that where the judge has seen, has heard, and has observed the witnesses and the many things that transpire in a court-room which are not susceptible of being taken down by a stenographer
Primus v. Primus 129 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Olivier v. Abunza, 1954, , ; Jones v. Jones, 1957, 232 La.
Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co. 121 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
254, 271 , ; Olivier v. Abunza, 1954, , ; Barlotta v. Walker, 1953, 223 La.
Scheppegrell v. Barth 117 So. 2d 903 La. 1960
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., 227 La.
Kendrick v. Kendrick 106 So. 2d 707 La. 1958
Fouquier v. Fouquier 91 So. 2d 591 La. 1956
In Olivier v. Abunza (Olivier), , , we stated: "This Court has a rule, which is but a splendid affirmative in determining evidence taken by another court, that where the judge has seen, has heard, and has observed the witnesses and the many things that transpire in a courtroom which are not susceptible of being taken down by a sten
Abunza v. Olivier 88 So. 2d 815 La. 1956
Second Church of Christ, Scientist v. Spencer 88 So. 2d 810 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., 227 La.
Southwest Gas Producing Co. v. Hattie Brothers 88 So. 2d 649 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., 227 La.
Barrett Division of Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Kennedy Saw Mills, Inc. 88 So. 2d 5 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Co., 227 La.
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.
Holmes Company v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
Holmes Co. v. Foret 86 So. 2d 66 La. 1956
Allison v. Pick 86 So. 2d 179 La. 1956
341 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Ins.
Caddo Parish School Board v. Bland 82 So. 2d 687 La. 1955
Wier v. Grubb 82 So. 2d 1 La. 1955