Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Myrtle Grove Packing Company v. Mones, 76 So. 2d 305.

23 citing documents.

Mitchell v. VALTEAU 30 So. 3d 1108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
3 Executory process is a “unique and harsh remedy requiring strict construction.” Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co., 528 *( , (1954)).
Ellis Const. v. Vieux Carre Resort Propert. 934 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
2 Cir. 5/4/88), , (1954).
First Guar. Bk. v. Baton Rouge Petroleum Center, Inc. 529 So. 2d 834 La. 1988
(1954) and the many decisions cited therein.
Moore v. Louisiana Bank & Trust Co. 528 So. 2d 606 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Citizen's Finance Service Discount of Baton Rouge v. Hollier 398 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Fidelity Nat. Bank of Baton Rouge v. Pitchford 374 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1954); Slidell Building Sup.
Neff v. Ford Motor Credit Co. 347 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Cameron Brown South, Inc. v. East Glen Oaks, Inc. 341 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Peyrefitte v. Harvey 312 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Baton Rouge Bank and Trust Company v. Subco, Inc. 306 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Appellees further contend that nullity results from a disparity in the percentage of attorney's fees stipulated in the collateral mortgage note and the hand note, , (1954) in support of this contention.
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Blackwell 295 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Reed v. Meaux 292 So. 2d 557 La. 1974
(1954) and the many decisions cited therein.
Slidell Building Sup., Inc. v. IDS Mortgage Corp. 273 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
First National Bank of Lafayette v. Gaddis 250 So. 2d 504 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
Powell v. Carter 233 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
that executory process is a harsh remedy requiring strict compliance with the letter of the law for validity.
Ford Motor Credit Company v. Samec 227 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
Bourgeois v. Sazdoff 209 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
" , , the Supreme Court said: "`Executory process, under which a creditor is permitted, without citation or the usual legal delays, to seize the property of the debtor in satisfaction of a claim, is a harsh remedy specifically sanctioned by the Constitution, Section 44 of Article VII, * * *.
Bickham Motors, Inc. v. Crain 185 So. 2d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company 158 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
the Supreme Court reiterated the well-settled law as to executory process in no uncertain language, viz.: "Executory process, under which a creditor is permitted, without citation or the usual legal delays, to seize the property of the debtor in satisfaction of a claim, is a harsh remedy specifically
MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Dixon 142 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
the Supreme Court said: "Executory process, under which a creditor is permitted, without citation *609 or the usual legal delays, to seize the property of the debtor in satisfaction of a claim, is a harsh remedy specifically sanctioned by the Constitution, Section 44 of Article VII, * * *.
Li Rocchi v. Keen 134 So. 2d 893 La. 1961
Doherty v. Randazzo 128 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
Li Rocchi v. Keen 127 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Ricks v. Bernstein, 19 La.Ann.