DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson, 82 So. 2d 8.

29 citing documents.

  • Stephens v. State Through Dept. of Transp. 440 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Breaux v. Roy Young, Inc. 397 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    1038 , (1961), , (1955).
  • Netterville v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 314 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Mitchell v. Fowler 295 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    1038 , (1961), , (1955).
  • Smith v. Tate 289 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    1038 , (1961), , (1955).
  • McGuinness v. United Services Automobile Ass'n 275 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    .” We believe that the accident in this case was caused by the unexpected and unforeseen “blow out” of the left rear tire of the car owned by the defendant’s insured.
  • Hickman Ex Rel. Iles v. Southern Pacific Transport Co. 262 So. 2d 385 La. 1972
    1038 , (1961), , (1955).
  • David v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 242 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    1 Cir. 1963); , (1955) ; Dane v. Canal Insurance Co., 240 La.
  • Odom v. Texas Farm Products Co. 229 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
    915 , (1956); , (1955); Bourgeois v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
  • Tannehill v. Roberts 216 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Augello v. Call 210 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    1038 , ; , , and Frey v. DiMaggio, La.App., .
  • Davidson v. Curole 196 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    915 , ; *314 Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson, 1955, , ; Bourgeois v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, La.App.1958, ; Wiley v. Sutphin, La.App.1959, .” See also Jones v. Continental Casualty Company, supra.
  • Hall Houston v. City of Shreveport 188 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    (1955); Snodgrass v. Centanni, 229 La.
  • Jaeger v. Herald 186 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    (1955); Whitfield v. Travelers Ins.
  • Waller v. King 188 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    See, also, , (1955); Dane v. Canal Insurance Company, 240 La.
  • Mire v. Birmingham Fire Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 176 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    2d 336 ; Breaux v. Valin, La.App., ; Higginbotham v. Frazier, La.App., ; , .
  • Jackson v. Indiana Lumber Men's Mutual Insurance 175 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    It is urgently contended by counsel for defendants that the doctrine of sudden emergency is not applicable under the facts of the instant case, and that, according to the testimony, plaintiff wife would have avoided the accident if she had continued in her proper lane of travel, , .
  • Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago, Ill. 169 So. 2d 50 La. 1964
    Breaux v. Valin, La.App., ; Higginbotham v. Frazier, La.App., ; , .
  • Myers v. Carolina Casualty Co. 167 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Jones v. Continental Casualty Co. of Chicago 159 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    915 , ; , ; Bourgcois v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, La.App.
  • Fornea v. Lindsley-Feiber Motors Co. 152 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    at pages 9-10, the Supreme Court said: “We are fully cognizant of the well-recognized and accepted rule that one who suddenly finds himself in a position of imminent peril, without sufficient time to consider and weigh all the circumstances or best means that may be adopted to avoid an impending danger
  • Breaux v. Valin 138 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    272 , ; Nicolle v. Gayden, La.App.
  • Dane v. Canal Insurance Company 126 So. 2d 355 La. 1960
    .” See also Teche Lines, Inc. v. Gorum et al., 202 La.
  • Thibodeaux v. Gore 124 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    915 , ; Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson, 1955, , ; Bourgeois *338 v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, La.App.1958, ; Wiley v. Sutphin, La.App.1959, .
  • Bourgeois v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 102 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    915 , ; Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson, 1955, , ; Troy v. Lanclos, La.App.1955, ."
  • Cook v. Dance 96 So. 2d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    915 , ; Commercial Standard Insurance Company v. Johnson, 1955, , ; Troy v. Landos, La.App.
  • Higginbotham v. Frazier 92 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    ddenly proceeding to obstruct plaintiff's lane, but instead from plaintiff's driver's unreasonably based and unrealized fear that Frazier's truck might obstruct his passage, then defendant Frazier's actions created no sudden emergency, as plaintiff's driver's path was unobstructed "other than by his naked anticipation of a possible collision," Commercial Standard Insurance Company *91 v. Johnson, , , at page 9.
  • Snodgrass v. Centanni 87 So. 2d 127 La. 1956
  • Nicolle v. Gayden 83 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    even come onto the paved portion of the highway, we are inclined to believe that “no sudden emergency ever existed calling for any heroic measures such as would have compelled ah ordinarily prudent and careful person to have deliberately pulled * * under the prevailing circumstances then ■existing” his truck so far to the left arid onto the shoulder, , , at page 10, in a roughly similar recent case by our Supreme Court denying recovery when a truck driver pulled to a left shoulder when his path