Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Boucher v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor, 75 So. 2d 343.

25 citing documents.

Bannister v. Department of Streets 647 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(1954), in which the supreme court held that the termination of three civil ^service em *386 ployees was improper because each had been removed without prior advance written notice as mandated by the state civil service rule then in effect.
Sidney N. Collier Memorial Vocational-Technical School v. Caulfield 460 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
(1954), which has since been overruled by Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources
Sanders v. Dept. of Health and Human Resources 394 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
1 Cir. 1980), , (1954); hence, we sustained the appellant's peremptory exception on the ground that the appellant's removal was improper in view of the fact that the appointing authority failed to comply with Rule 12.3 of the Civil Service Commission Rules, which requires the appointing authority to furnish the Directo
Paisant v. University of New Orleans 391 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1949), insofar as it held contrary to its decision in Sanders .
Sanders v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 388 So. 2d 768 La. 1980
[2] The *770 court noted that, although the application of the rule was "hypertechnical" and Ms. Sanders had shown no prejudice resulting from its violation, , (1954).
Picton v. Sewerage & Water Board 385 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
105 , (1955); , (1954); Pettit v. Reitzell, 202 La.
White v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 385 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
(1954), Young v. Charity Hospital of Louisiana, 226 La.
Sanders v. Department of Health & Human Resources 383 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Our Supreme Court, , (1954), emphasized the importance of following every such Rule unreservedly.
Shelfo v. LHHRA, Pinecrest State School 361 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Louviere v. Pontchartrain Levee District 199 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
the Supreme Court held that an attempted dismissal was totally ineffective for failure to timely give notice to the Director notwithstanding proper notice was afforded the employee.
Boucher v. Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor 169 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
“ ‘This is in no manner an attempt to rationalize the conduct of this appellant for it has not been proved to my satisfaction that he conspired to commit or committed fraud which would justify his removal from the State service.’ ” In this record we find an interlocutory ruling of the Commission which involved the first decision of the Supreme Court in *681 these cases ( ) and we quote the following portion thereof: “We are informed that the Supreme Court was requested to remand the cases to thi
Colvin v. Division of Employment Security 132 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Purdy v. Department of Revenue of the State 116 So. 2d 290 La. 1959
105 , , , , contends that the notice of Purdy’s retirement was illegal because it failed to notify him of his right to appeal to the Louisiana Civil Service Commission.
Chadwick v. Department of Highways of the State 116 So. 2d 286 La. 1959
Counsel for Mr. Chadwick further say in this supplemental brief that the notice of his retirement was illegal because it failed to notify him of his right to appeal to the Louisiana Civil Service Commission, and they rely on Day v. Department of Institutions, supra, , .
Hermann v. New Orleans Police Department 113 So. 2d 612 La. 1959
In the first Boucher case ( , ) we held that the removals of plaintiffs from office were improper and illegal and set aside the order of the State Civil Service Commission removing them from office.
Munson v. State Parks & Recreation Commission 105 So. 2d 254 La. 1958
(a case involving removal for cause), the Director of Personnel must be furnished with advance written notice, as required by Section 2 of Rule XII of the Commission, before the appointing authority can notify the employee of his removal.
Bennett v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries Commission 101 So. 2d 199 La. 1958
Inasmuch as this Court did not in its prior decision ( , ) order plaintiff's reinstatement with back pay, it would not appear that the appointing authority violated a ministerial duty in not giving; plaintiff back pay on his reinstatement.
Anderson v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor 98 So. 2d 155 La. 1957
While that appeal was pending here, , .
State Ex Rel. Boucher v. Heard 94 So. 2d 451 La. 1957
State Ex Rel. Boucher v. Heard 84 So. 2d 827 La. 1955
See Boucher v. Division of Employment Security, etc., , .
Parker v. Board of Barber Examiners 84 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Day v. Department of Institutions 81 So. 2d 826 La. 1955
this Court held'that a person' who had acquired permanent civil service status could not be demoted, dismissed or discriminated against ’by the appointing authority without furnishing the employee and the Director, in advance of such action, a statement in writing giving explicit and' detailed reasons
Colvin v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 80 So. 2d 404 La. 1955
It is conceded by all parties that such failure of prior notice exists and in a , .
Anderson v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 79 So. 2d 565 La. 1955
and in that case this court held that the dismissal was improper.
Distinguished Domas v. Division of Employment Security of Department of Labor 79 So. 2d 857 La. 1955
Counsel for appellant seek to have the judgment rendered in the consolidated ■cases of Boucher v. Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor, cited in , , control the issues here.