Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 79 So. 2d 483.

64 citing documents.

Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Davis 166 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , .
Suckle v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 163 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
In this connection, we note the following language from the case of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , (1955): "It is well settled by our jurisprudence that besides other factors, the most important test in determining `whether a person employed to do certain work is an independent contractor or a mere servant is the control over the work which is reserved by the employer.'
Truitt v. B & G Crane Service, Inc. 165 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
* * *" The problem whether a workman is a borrowed employee or the employee of an independent contractor has been presented to the appellate courts of this state on many occasions and under varying circumstances; some of such cases are: B & G Crane Service, Inc. v. Thomas W. Hooley & Sons, supra; Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , ; Benoit v. Hunt Tool Co., 219 La.
Bryant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 163 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
And, in Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , , our Supreme Court said: “It is well settled by our jurisprudence that besides other factors, the most important test in determining *101 'whether a person employed to do certain work is an independent contractor or a mere servant is the control over the work which is reserved by the employer.’ It is a
Kamm v. Morgan 157 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
[3] Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , .
Landry v. American Surety Co. 149 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
In Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , , the Supreme Court said: “It is well settled by our jurisprudence that besides other factors, the most important test in determining ‘whether a person employed to do certain work is an independent contractor or a mere servant is the control over the work which is reserved by the employer.’ It is also w
McCutchen v. Fruge 132 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
380 , ; Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , ; B & G Crane Service v. Thomas W. Hooley & Sons, 227 La.
Guenard v. Key 131 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Plaintiff relies exclusively upon the cases of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 1955, , ; Malloy v. Buckner-Harmon Wood Contractors, La.App.
Distinguished Thompson v. National Surety Corporation 124 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Among the cases cited and relied upon by plaintiffs is that of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , .
Morton v. American Employers Insurance Co. 104 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
The contention is untenable in view of our findings above set forth, but cited in support of this contention is Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 1955, , .
Malloy v. Buckner-Harmon Wood Contractors 100 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1958
Counsel for plaintiffs, with equal vigor, urges the holding of the Supreme Court in the recent case of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , , in support of their contention.
Nichols v. Iowa Mutual Insurance Company 95 So. 2d 338 La. 1957
In the case of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , this court laid down the test of an independent contract relationship.
Shelton v. Barber Brothers Company 94 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , 79 So.
Ainsworth v. Henry & Hall 79 So. 2d 489 La. 1955
*382 The issues herein presented arose out of the same accident involved in the case of Amyx v. Henry & Hall, , , both cases having been previously consolidated by the district court for purposes of trial and appeal.