Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Green v. Small, 79 So. 2d 497.

18 citing documents.

  • Lazarus Trading Co. v. Unopened Succession of Foster Fuller Washington 201 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
  • City of Baton Rouge v. Smuggy's Corp. 156 So. 3d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
    See, -411 , (1955); Geisenberger v. Cotton, 116 La.
  • Mitchell v. Cooper 121 So. 3d 736 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
  • Florence E. Fessler v. Mary A. Brumfield La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/29/97), ( So.2d 497 (1955)).
  • Fessler v. Brumfield 37 So. 3d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , ( , (1955)).
  • Cooper v. Buxton 979 So. 2d 1291 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 10/29/97) , ( , (1955)).
  • Clarence Lavaughn Cooper, Et Ux. v. Karen Kay Travis Buxton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    3 Cir. 10/29/97), ( So.2d 497 (1955)).
  • Liner v. Lewis 792 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • Followed Connally v. Nevils 702 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    *1046 While we regard the question of whether property can be partitioned in kind better described as a mixed question of law and fact, , (1955), which pronounced that "[w]hether land should be divided in kind or by licitation is a question of fact to be decided by the judge before whom the partition proceedings are tried."
  • Loupe v. Bybee 570 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Chevron Oil Co. v. Traigle 436 So. 2d 530 La. 1983
    199 , (1956) (the seeking of an order for a bond to cover costs of preparing for trial constitutes a waiver), , (1955) (filing stipulations constitutes a waiver).
  • Melancon v. Continental Casualty Company 307 So. 2d 308 La. 1975
    E. g., *312 , (1955); Geisenberger v. Cotton, 116 La.
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 260 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    nterpretation of Code of Practice Art. 612 which provided: “The nullity of a judgment rendered against a party without his having been cited, or by an incompetent judge, even if all the formalities of the law have been observed, may be demanded at any time, unless the defendant were present in the parish, and yet suffered the judgment to be executed without opposing the same.” , (1955); Dipuma v. Anselmo, La.App., (1st Cir. 1962) for examples of the interpretation of Code of Practice Art. 612.
  • McElwee v. McElwee 255 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • LeBlanc v. Thibodaux 162 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    199 , ; , and State v. United Dredging Co., 218 La.
  • Burnett v. Tucker 150 So. 2d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Wilson v. King 96 So. 2d 641 La. 1957
  • State ex rel. Shields, Inc. v. Southport Petroleum Corp. 88 So. 2d 25 La. 1956
    we held that the defendant waived his right to claim abandonment by appearing in court and filing a stipulation and a plea of prescription.