DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Orlando v. Polito, 84 So. 2d 433.

54 citing documents.

  • Ames Growe, III v. Raymond Johnson and Johnson Realty & Investment Co. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
    App. 4th Ct. 1969) ( So.
  • Lobue v. Simco Industries, Inc. 690 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    34 , (1958); , (1955); Guin v. Commercial Casualty Ins.
  • Winford Co. v. Webster Gravel & Asphalt 571 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    Barker v. Rust Engineering, Co., , (La.
  • Gottlieb v. Tulane Univ. of Louisiana 529 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    34 , (1958); , (1955); Guin v. Commercial Casualty Ins.
  • Boulos v. Morrison 503 So. 2d 1 La. 1987
    34 , (1958); , (1955); Guin v. Commercial Casualty Ins.
  • Brousseau v. Tucker 479 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • In re the Succession of Kennedy 423 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Cable v. Cazayou 351 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Johnson v. Romaguera 349 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1977
  • Wycoff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 286 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1955); Krison v. Texas Industries, Inc., (La.App.
  • Big" A" Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. v. Bay Sand & Grav. Co., Inc. 282 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    989 , (1945); , (1955); Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc., (La.App.
  • Adams v. Wood 285 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Canter v. Koehring Company, La., (1973); , (1955); (La.App.
  • Geer v. Nelson Dodge, Inc. 282 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Knight v. Oden 282 So. 2d 612 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1955); Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc., (La.App.
  • Wendelken Machine Shop, Inc. v. Dibert, Bancroft & Ross Co. 279 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    the Supreme Court said: “ ‘It is well settled that the trial judge’s findings on question (sic) of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.’ ” 238 So.2
  • April v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Texas 273 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    (1955), where it was stated: "It is well settled that the trial judge's findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Williams v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 266 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    1st Cir., 1971); , (1955).
  • Brown v. Ducote 258 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Bergeron v. Parish Lumber Home Improvements, Inc. 255 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Krison v. Texas Industries, Inc. 253 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
  • Domingeaux v. Davis 250 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Guidry v. Matherne 244 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    our Supreme Court said: “It is well settled, that the trial judge’s findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Deville v. Allstate Insurance Co. 242 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Slack v. Fleet 242 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Sanders v. Roy 242 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    our Supreme Court said: “It is well settled that the trial judge’s findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Jefferson v. Strickland 242 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    the Court said: "It is well settled that the trial judge's findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Gardere v. Deffez 241 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Guillory v. Johnson 238 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    34 , (1958) ; , (1955); Sandel v. Travelers Ins.
  • Trahan v. Continental Insurance Co. 237 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    34 , (1958); , (1955); (La.App.
  • McCann v. George 238 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    the Supreme Court said: “It is well settled that the trial judge’s findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed un *200 less clearly erroneous.
  • Readco Industries, Inc. v. Myrmax Specialties, Inc. 236 So. 2d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Scruggs v. McCraney 234 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Lang v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 230 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Tipton v. Loker 230 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Coleman v. Brook 227 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Ventress v. Danel-Ryder, Inc. 225 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
  • Fortenberry v. Ellis 217 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1955), and cases cited therein.
  • Katz v. Employers Group of Insurance Companies 204 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    “It is well settled that the trial judge’s findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous * * * ” , .
  • Campbell v. Libersat 203 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    (1955): “For a new trial to be granted on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the party praying for it must show clearly that he discovered this evidence after the trial, and that he used every effort and all diligence in his power to timely procure the necessary evidence, and, if his vigilanc
  • Evers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 187 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    3 Cir., ; , ; and Fontenot v. Snow, La.App.
  • Succession of Smith 175 So. 2d 269 La. 1965
    we said: "It is well settled that the trial judge's findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Succession of Ridley 175 So. 2d 269 La. 1965
    we said: “It is well settled that the trial judge’s findings on question of fact, and particularly on questions involving the credibility of witnesses who testified before him, are entitled to great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous.
  • Hudson v. Arceneaux 169 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Among the many cases in which this rule is recognized are: , ; Barnes v. LeBlanc, 207 La.
  • Russell v. Bemis Bros. Bag Co. 169 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
  • Melerine v. Maryland Casualty Co. 166 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Fortenberry v. Scogin, La.App., ; Oubre v. Judice, La.App., ; Hatten v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., La.App., ; Patton v. Argonaut Underwriters Insurance Co., La.App., ; , ; and many others.
  • Flynn v. Katz 164 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Platt v. Scarborough, La.App., ; Oubre v. Judice, La.App., ; Fortenberry v. Scogin, La.App., .
  • Harless v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 164 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Orlando v. Polito, La.App., ; Oubre v. Judice, La.App., ; Platt v. Scarborough, La.App., .
  • Canzoneri v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of Hartford 163 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    Fortenberry v. Scogin, La.App., ; Oubre v. Judice, La.App., ; Platt v. Scarborough, La.App., ; Patton v. Argonaut Underwriters Insurance Co., La.App., ; Hatten v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., La.App., .
  • Davis v. American Marine Corp. 163 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    Fortenberry v. Scogin, La.
  • Martin v. LeBlanc 157 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    (1955); Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.