Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dietz v. Dietz, 80 So. 2d 414.

20 citing documents.

  • Succession of Cloud 508 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    4th Cir.1982); , (1955).
  • Wilson v. Progressive State Bank & Trust Co. 446 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    Russell v. Culpepper, supra ; (La.App.
  • Sabrier v. Leard 426 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    (1955); Peyton v. Roth, 149 La.
  • Russell v. Culpepper 344 So. 2d 1372 La. 1977
    Succession of Terral, supra; , (1955); Succession of Combre, 217 La.
  • Salley Grocer Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co. 223 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
    409 , (1957); , (1955); United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, etc. v. Stephens Broadcasting Co., 214 La.
  • Succession of Elrod v. Elrod 218 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    688 , (1960); , (1955); , La.App.
  • Grant v. Touro Infirmary 169 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • Kinney v. Kinney 150 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    60 , ; , ; Succession of Nelson, 224 La.
  • Succession of Delaune 138 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    in which case it was held that proof of a vendor's collection of rents and the proceeds from an oil lease affecting property sold is sufficient to place the burden of proof upon the party seeking to establish the validity of the sale.
  • Spiers v. Davidson 135 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    273 , ; , .” The record presents the testimony of several witnesses and a number of exhibits which have a material bearing upon the question of whether or not the transfer was simulated.
  • Martin v. Martin 129 So. 2d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Orleans, ; , ; Howard v. Howard, La.App.
  • Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 128 So. 2d 644 La. 1961
    928 , ; , ; A. K. Roy, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 237 La.
  • Johnston v. Bearden 127 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    In this connection, it was held, , , that, in conformity with the provisions of Art. 2444 of the LSA-Civil Code, plaintiffs had the burden of proving by preponderating or convincing evidence, that the sales attacked were without consideration, but that such proof need not establish the fact to an irresistible conclusion or certainty
  • Illinois Central Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission 125 So. 2d 387 La. 1960
    928 , ; , ; A. K. Roy, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 237 La.
  • Fontenot v. Derbonne 109 So. 2d 85 La. 1959
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Boudreaux 96 So. 2d 650 La. 1957
  • Spiers v. Davidson 96 So. 2d 502 La. 1957
  • Balzrette v. Hughes 94 So. 2d 649 La. 1957
  • Dietz v. Dietz 94 So. 2d 656 La. 1957
    This court in a prior case between the same parties, reported in , , remanded the proceedings to the lower court with the instruction that “should the defendants fail to produce the witnesses above referred to without good cause, then the sales are to be set aside as the presumption would be so great as to render the conclusion of simulation inescapable.” In reman
  • Lavergne v. Indemnity Insurance Co. 84 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    the Supreme Court exercised the prerogative given to appellate courts under Article 906, Code of Practice.