Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Dietz v. Dietz, 80 So. 2d 414.
-
Succession of Cloud
508 So. 2d 577
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
4th Cir.1982); , (1955).
-
Wilson v. Progressive State Bank & Trust Co.
446 So. 2d 867
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
Russell v. Culpepper, supra ; (La.App.
-
Sabrier v. Leard
426 So. 2d 213
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
(1955); Peyton v. Roth, 149 La.
-
Russell v. Culpepper
344 So. 2d 1372
La. 1977
Succession of Terral, supra; , (1955); Succession of Combre, 217 La.
-
Salley Grocer Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.
223 So. 2d 5
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
409 , (1957); , (1955); United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, etc. v. Stephens Broadcasting Co., 214 La.
-
Succession of Elrod v. Elrod
218 So. 2d 83
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
688 , (1960); , (1955); , La.App.
- Grant v. Touro Infirmary 169 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
-
Kinney v. Kinney
150 So. 2d 671
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
60 , ; , ; Succession of Nelson, 224 La.
-
Succession of Delaune
138 So. 2d 41
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
in which case it was held that proof of a vendor's collection of rents and the proceeds from an oil lease affecting property sold is sufficient to place the burden of proof upon the party seeking to establish the validity of the sale.
-
Spiers v. Davidson
135 So. 2d 540
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
273 , ; , .” The record presents the testimony of several witnesses and a number of exhibits which have a material bearing upon the question of whether or not the transfer was simulated.
-
Martin v. Martin
129 So. 2d 56
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Orleans, ; , ; Howard v. Howard, La.App.
-
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
128 So. 2d 644
La. 1961
928 , ; , ; A. K. Roy, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 237 La.
-
Johnston v. Bearden
127 So. 2d 319
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
In this connection, it was held, , , that, in conformity with the provisions of Art. 2444 of the LSA-Civil Code, plaintiffs had the burden of proving by preponderating or convincing evidence, that the sales attacked were without consideration, but that such proof need not establish the fact to an irresistible conclusion or certainty
-
Illinois Central Railroad v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
125 So. 2d 387
La. 1960
928 , ; , ; A. K. Roy, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, 237 La.
- Fontenot v. Derbonne 109 So. 2d 85 La. 1959
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Boudreaux 96 So. 2d 650 La. 1957
- Spiers v. Davidson 96 So. 2d 502 La. 1957
- Balzrette v. Hughes 94 So. 2d 649 La. 1957
-
Dietz v. Dietz
94 So. 2d 656
La. 1957
This court in a prior case between the same parties, reported in , , remanded the proceedings to the lower court with the instruction that “should the defendants fail to produce the witnesses above referred to without good cause, then the sales are to be set aside as the presumption would be so great as to render the conclusion of simulation inescapable.” In reman
-
Lavergne v. Indemnity Insurance Co.
84 So. 2d 617
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
the Supreme Court exercised the prerogative given to appellate courts under Article 906, Code of Practice.