Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Saunders v. Walker, 86 So. 2d 89.
- American Security Ins. Co. v. Griffith's Air Con. 317 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
-
Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Purvis
316 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
137 , (1964); , (1956); Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
- New Orleans Shrimp Co., Inc. v. DUPLANTIS TRUCK L., INC. 283 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Dykes v. North River Insurance Company 270 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
-
Isom v. Page
257 So. 2d 720
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
ol of the defendant or his servants and the injury would not have occurred unless negligence had been present in some form and the facts causing the injury are peculiarly within the knowledge of defendant and not equally accessible to plaintiff, the burden is on defendant to explain the cause of the accident, if he desires to escape from the inference of negligence.” See also: , (1956).
-
Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
251 So. 2d 166
La. 1971
137 , (1964); , (1956); Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
-
O'Reilly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
230 So. 2d 630
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Negligence § 220(2), p. 987; , ; Gerald et ux.
-
Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.
209 So. 2d 785
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Plaintiff relies on such cases as Plunkett v. United Electric Service, supra; , ; Mosley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., La.App., ; and Talley v. Brock Furniture Co., La.
-
Vogt v. Hotard
144 So. 2d 714
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
App., ; , ; Lykiardopoulo v. New Orleans & C. R. Light & Power Co., 127 La.
-
Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. Gillette Oil Co.
139 So. 2d 541
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
S. Radiator Corporation, La.App., ; , ; Roy v. Louisiana State Department of Agr.
-
Bauer v. Columbia Casualty Company
126 So. 2d 398
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
-
Dowden v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company
124 So. 2d 254
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Loprestie v. Roy Motors, Inc., et al., 191 La.
-
Great American Indemnity Company v. Ford
122 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Negligence § 220 (2), p. 987; , ; Gerald et ux.
-
Shields v. United Gas Pipe Line Company
110 So. 2d 881
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is that when a thing which causes injury without fault of the injured person is shown to be under the exclusive control, actual or constructive (Johnson v. Louisiana Coca-Cola Bottling Co., Ltd., La.App., ; , ), of the defendant, or where freedom of fault is shown on the part of all persons through whose hands the instrumentality passed after it left defendant (Plunkett v. United Electric Service, 214 La.
-
Williams v. US Royal Tires
101 So. 2d 488
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
788 , , at *491 pages 396-397, 49 A.L.R.2d 362 , or `to exculpate himself from negligence,' , , at page 93; Watkins v. Gulf Refining Company, 206 La.
-
Gillis v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
95 So. 2d 186
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
788 , at pages 396-397, or “to exculpate himself from negligence,” , , at page 93; Watkins v. Gulf Refining Company, 206 La.
-
Larkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
91 So. 2d 94
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
788 , , at pages 396-397, or “to exculpate himself from negligence,” , , at page 93; Watkins v. Gulf Refining Company, 206 La.
-
Fouquier v. Fouquier
91 So. 2d 591
La. 1956
370 , ; , ; McMahon v. Manufacturers Casualty Co., 227 La.
-
Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHinery
90 So. 2d 417
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Bush v. Bookter, La.App.