41932 Precedential Processed

State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Barrow

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed December 14, 1959 · 116 So. 2d 703

Cited by

Lieber v. Caddo Levee Dist. Bd. of Com'rs 660 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State, Department of Highways v. Osbon 292 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Smith 270 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
State, Department of Highways v. Spera 272 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
State, Department of Highways v. Smith 272 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Mason 218 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Orleans Parish School Board v. Schuler 200 So. 2d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Jacques 197 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Greenwald 188 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. Roy 198 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Gulf States Utilities Company v. Norman 183 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
State, Dept. of Highways v. Ouachita Parish Sch. Bd. 162 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964

Opinion text

On Application for Rehearing PER CURIAM. In her application for a rehearing defendant .complains of the value awarded her for the property identified as the commercial site fronting on Market Street. She contends that this site, because of its depth' in excess of the adjoining property, enjoys a greater value than that awarded. We took into consideration that the subject property has a depth of 100 feet rather than the 60 foot depth of adjoining property; hut due to the terrain and characteristics of the rear portion of this commercial site, we feel that an award of $150 per front foot was just and reasonable.