Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Messersmith v. Messersmith, 86 So. 2d 169.

79 citing documents.

  • Kelly O. Orgeron v. Edward J. Orgeron, Jr. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
  • Derek Blaine Baumbouree v. Sharon Meche Baumbouree La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Baumbouree v. Baumbouree 202 So. 3d 1077 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Funderburg v. Superior Energy Services, Inc. 83 So. 3d 1148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Succession of Julius Arabie La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Succession of Arabie 57 So. 3d 573 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Succession of Duke 16 So. 3d 459 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    “There is nothing more fundamental in our law than the rule of property which declares that this community is a partnership in which the husband and wife own equal shares, their title thereto vesting at the very instant such property is acquired.” , (1956).
  • LA. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. McWilliams 996 So. 2d 1036 La. 2008
  • Melancon v. Melancon 928 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Messersmith v. *15 Messersmith, , -75 (1956).
  • Lanza v. Lanza 898 So. 2d 280 La. 2005
    5 Cir.1988) (non-partner spouse not bound by the partnership agreement), writ granted, remanded, , (1956) (restrictions in articles of incorporation, bylaws, or cross purchase agreements do not generally apply to transfers between spouses, unless both spouses sign).
  • Fowler v. Fowler 861 So. 2d 181 La. 2003
  • Corley v. Baden 781 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • Robinson v. Robinson 778 So. 2d 1105 La. 2001
    James & Co., supra ; see generally, , (1956); (La.
  • In Re Succession of Moss 769 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    In support of her argument, , (1956) (La.App.
  • Mercer v. Mercer 671 So. 2d 937 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    James & Co., , (1956).
  • Alford v. Alford 653 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    James & Co., supra; , (1956); (La.App.
  • FARMERS-MERCHANTS BANK v. St. Katherine Ins. 640 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
  • Hare v. Hodgins 586 So. 2d 118 La. 1991
    James & Co., supra; James see generally, , (1956); (La.App.
  • Camp v. Camp 580 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • Succession of Netterville 579 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • Mestayer v. Williams 569 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    (1956), the husband contended that stock registered in his name should not be divided in kind but that he should be allowed to retain all of the stock and pay his wife only one-half of its book value.
  • Rearden v. Rearden 568 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    2d Cir.1964); , (1956); White v. White, 159 La.
  • Little v. Little 513 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    (1956), upon which the court in Due relied.
  • Dean v. Nunez 503 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
  • Lovell v. Lovell 490 So. 2d 330 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Phillips v. Wagner 470 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • McCOY v. McCOY 460 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • McCoy v. McCoy 460 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • Succession of Tucker 445 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956).
  • Patterson v. Patterson 417 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    In support of the proposition that alimony pendente lite constitutes a community debt, rather than a debt of the husband's (or paying spouse's) separate estate, , (1956).
  • Kennedy v. Kennedy 391 So. 2d 1193 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    Sims v. Sims, supra; T. L. James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery, supra; , (1956).
  • Thrash v. Thrash 387 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Civil Code Article 2334; , (1956) .
  • Lane v. Lane 375 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • Holliday v. Holliday 358 So. 2d 618 La. 1978
    849 , (1956); , (1956); Hillard v. Hillard, supra ; Eals v. Swan, 221 La.
  • Sims v. Sims 358 So. 2d 919 La. 1978
  • Avoyelles Trust & Sav. Bank v. LILIEDAHL'S ESTATE 348 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Sims v. Sims 349 So. 2d 974 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    (1956) the suit involved the partition of the community, but the court confined itself, on this point, to reversing the lower court’s finding that the annuity insurance policy had no value and to declaring that it was a community asset without addressing itself to the questions of valuation and partitio
  • Gondrella v. Gondrella 347 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    2nd Cir. 1964); , (1956); White v. White, 159 La.
  • Due v. Due 342 So. 2d 161 La. 1977
  • TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 332 So. 2d 834 La. 1976
    In denying the husband the right to the stock to the exclusion of the wife, and after quoting Articles 2399 and 2402 of the Civil Code, , (1956), said: "There is nothing more fundamental in our law than the rule of property which declares that this community is a partnership in which the husband and wife own equal shares, their title thereto *843 vesting at the very instant such property is acquired.
  • Roberts v. Roberts 325 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
  • Jochum v. Estate of Favre 313 So. 2d 870 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • TL James & Co., Inc. v. Montgomery 308 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    The second wife maintains that the proceeds of the plans form a part of their community of acquets and gains, and decedent cannot deprive her of her rights to these funds by merely naming a beneficiary to its death benefits, , (1956)
  • Smith v. Succession of Smith 298 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Lynch v. Lawrence 293 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
  • Charbonnet v. Martin 285 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    584 ; , ; U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Green, 252 La.
  • Vicknair v. Vicknair 284 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Cryer v. M & M Manufacturing Company, Inc. 273 So. 2d 818 La. 1973
    Art. 460; , (1956); Yiannopoulos, Louisiana Civil Law Treatise: Property § 13, pp. 33-34 (1967).
  • Hargrove v. Hargrove 272 So. 2d 394 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
  • Hamilton v. Hamilton 258 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    *663 (1956); Succession of Wiener, 203 La.