Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Successions of Rhea, 78 So. 2d 838.

34 citing documents.

Gwen Fontenot and Renee M. Brown v. Todd P. McKellar La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Salvatierra v. Calderon 836 So. 2d 149 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
McCreary Enterprises, L.L.C. v. Hemmans 802 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The other presumption is that “whenever a person has acquired a residence elsewhere and actually resides there it is presumed to be his domicile.” Successions of Rhea [ , ], supra.
Kanz v. Wilson 703 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
In Successions of Rhea, , (1955), the supreme court set forth the following basic tenets regarding the law pertaining to domicile: A change of domicile is brought about by the actual residing in another place with the intention of making it the principal establishment or home....
Laborde v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n 670 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
Pattan v. Fields 669 So. 2d 1233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 3rd Cir.1992) Successions of Rhea, , (1995) CONCLUSION After close consideration of the testimony of the witnesses mentioned above, the exhibits, statutes, constitutional article, jurisprudence and after intense observation of the defendant, his brother, other witnesses, the attorneys, and the audience, the Court finds that the plaintiff h
Sheets v. Sheets 612 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
Broussard v. Romero 607 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Ozen v. Abraham 566 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Wilson v. Shea 565 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Ober v. Bounds 528 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
Ben Chambers & Associates, Inc. v. Dornstadter 524 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Wilson v. Butler 513 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
Trotter v. Trotter 503 So. 2d 1160 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Succession of Thompson v. Harrington 502 So. 2d 229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
McLaughlin v. French 492 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Succession of Barnes 490 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
See CC Art. 41; Successions of Rhea, 227 La 214, (1955).
Gowins v. Gowins 466 So. 2d 32 La. 1985
art. 38; [3] *35 (La., 1983); , (1955).
Messer v. London 438 So. 2d 546 La. 1983
Tomlinson v. Frazier 407 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Mason v. Mason 399 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
In Re Kennedy 357 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
The court disregarded express intent in Successions of Rhea, , (1955); Texana Oil & Refining Co. v. Belchic, 150 La.
Gelpi v. Ben Development Company, Inc. 327 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Charbonnet v. Hayes 318 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Successions of Rhea, , (1955).
Succession of McElwee 276 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
See Successions of Rhea, , (1955); Burgan v. Burgan, 207 La.
Caldas v. Zuccarello 224 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
In Successions of Rhea, , (1955) as quoted by us in Puissegur v. Puissegur, supra, at page 550, our Supreme Court made these statements after reviewing LSA-C.C.
Puissegur v. Puissegur 220 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
After a review of these articles and the pertinent jurisprudence on the subject our Supreme Court made these statements in Successions of Rhea, , (1955): "[1] A change of domicile is brought about by the actual residing in another place with the intention of making it the principal establishment or home.
Succession of Barger 217 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
67 and , as authority for the proposition that "where a person maintains and actually lives in only one residence that residence is his domicile."
Baham v. Sutherland 197 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
In Succession of Rhea , , the Supreme Court, respecting the essential elements of domicile, said: "The acts and conduct of the parties speak louder than words when it comes to a determination of domicile.
King v. King 173 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
478 , ; Successions of Rhea, , ; Foreman v. Jordan, La.
Gaudin v. Cunningham 164 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
In Successions of Rhea, , , the court held: “A change of domicile is brought about by the actual residing in another place with the intention of making it the principal establishment or home.
Walker v. Walker 157 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
See Successions of Rhea, , ; Broussard v. Domingue (3rd Cir. La.App.1962), .
Shockey v. Shockey 149 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
478 , ; Successions of Rhea, , ; Foreman v. Jordan, La.App., .
Foreman v. Jordan 131 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961